The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
In precisely the same fashion and at exactly the same time the
designation “Taits” came to be used for all Arabs by the Syrians of
Edessa and the inhabitants of Babylonia. Only, while we know nothing
of a distinct tribe of Saracens, which must very early have ceased to
exist as such, we have plentiful and trustworthy information concerning
the Tai in Arab literature. Their principal seat was in northern Nejd,
but they spread abroad in many directions. Even now their name has not
wholly passed out of remembrance.[7] By degrees the Aramæans came to
style all Arabs “Tayaye,” and the Persians adopted the name from them.[8]
Amongst the latter it is pronounced Tadjik, Tazik, in its more ancient
form (with the Persian suffix), and Tazi in the later form.[9] The Arabs
themselves reckon the Tai among the tribes which were once settled in
the south of the Arabian peninsula. We are probably right in connecting
their appearance in the north with a fresh wave which carried quite a
number of the tribes of south Arabia into the northern districts; a
tribal migration of which Arab tradition has much to tell, and some of it
authentic.
The Arabs were known at that period only as a wholly savage race.
Ammianus says of them: “_natio perniciosa_” (14, 4, 7), “_nec amici nobis
unquam nec hostes optandi_” (14, 4, 1). The whole description, which he
gives from contemporary information (14, 4), is very instructive, though
somewhat one-sided and exaggerated in certain particulars. When he says
that the Saracens live upon flesh and milk, and that most of them are
unacquainted with wheat or wine, the statement agrees with that in the
not much later Syrian _Vita_ of Simeon Stylites[10] that many “Taits”
did not know what bread was, but lived entirely upon flesh. There can be
no question that the northern Bedouins, the only ones the author had in
mind, can seldom have had an opportunity of procuring dates. Bread is
an article of luxury in Arabia even at the present time. The Bedouins of
the Sinaitic district, with whom S. Nilus (fifth century A.D.) had to do,
were quite exceptionally barbarous.[11]
ARAB CIVILISATION
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account