The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
Whether the Hephthalites wanted heavier payment for their assistance
than had been previously agreed upon, or whether Peroz did not keep
promises he had actually made, the end was that great conflicts ensued
between them and the Persians. Peroz won some victories; but in the
desert country east of the Caspian Sea the conduct of war is hampered
by enormous difficulties. Twice he was compelled to conclude peace on
unfavourable terms, once at least he himself fell into the hands of his
enemies, and for two years his son Kavadh had to remain in the enemy’s
camp as a hostage for the payment of his heavy ransom. Nevertheless
Peroz was perpetually breaking the pledges he had given. In 484 he
took the field with a large army. A tremendous battle ensued, in which
Peroz perished among the unrecognised slain. His daughter was among the
prisoners, and the king of the Hephthalites took her into his harem.
Evil days were now in store for Persia. The victors overran the
country. For a time there was no king. Presently, however, Zarmihr, of
the powerful house of the Karen, succeeded in restoring order in the
empire. At the time of Peroz’s death this man had been in Armenia, which
had rebelled again, and had almost completed its subjugation. He then
hastened to the capital and installed Balash, a brother of the late
ruler, as king. In all probability he afterward entered into negotiations
with the victorious enemy, and bought him off with a yearly tribute.
A brother of Balash, Zareh by name, who likewise aspired to the crown,
was defeated and slain. The king, however, had but little authority. He
was obliged to induce the Armenians to submit by allowing them to exclude
the state religion of Persia from their country altogether. The praise
which the Syrians and the Armenians render to Balash’s clemency may
perhaps have no other foundation than his disagreements with the priests
of Zoroaster. The enmity thus aroused proved fatal to him. His treasury,
of course, was empty, so that he could neither form a party among the
nobles nor attach an army to himself; and in 488 or 489 the priests went
so far as to have him blinded and so made incapable of governing. For
according to the law of Persia no man could be king who was not whole and
sound in body and mind.
KAVADH I
[Sidenote: [489-506 A.D.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account