The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
Mohammed conquered the Meccans mainly by paralysing their caravan trade.
When, in the eighth year after his departure from his native town, he
made his triumphal entry into it once more, it needed only one great
encounter with certain Bedouin tribes to bring the whole of Arabia to his
feet and to his faith. If the Bedouins had concluded binding alliances
against him in defence of the religious usages of their forefathers
and (what was still more important to them) their own independence, he
would have laboured in vain; but the inability of the pure Arab to unite
for common action and act under discipline, even for the attainment of
great ends, made it possible for him to bring one tribe after another
over to his side by force or friendly means. He even contrived to turn
to practical account the old connection between his family and the
tent-dwelling Choza’a in the neighbourhood of Mecca. He retained old
customs wherever it was possible so to do, instinctively rather than by
deliberate intention. Thus even the greater part of the heathen worship
of Mecca was adapted in externals to monotheism and incorporated _bona
fide_ into Islam. The first important successes, especially the battle
of Bedr (a great battle according to Arab notions), in which the men
of Mecca lost about seventy dead and seventy wounded, made a deep and
immediate impression: success is the test of proselytisers. The costly
presents which Mohammed gave out of his spoils to such distinguished men
as had not at once become converts at heart also wrought effectively;
in most cases a genuine conversion followed in time. One fact (among
others), by which we can estimate the striking impression the prophet
produced upon the Arabs, is that as each tribe submitted or adopted his
religion it renounced the right of retaliation for the blood shed in the
struggle. Under other circumstances this renunciation of blood-revenge,
or of wergild at least, would have seemed to the Arab the lowest depth
of humiliation. But hard as it might be for the Arabs in general to
acknowledge the prophet as their lord, there was at that time no pagan
who would have fought in earnest for his religion. At the utmost, an
old woman here and there raised a clamour when Mohammed destroyed her
idols. Compare this with the fashion in which other Semites fought for
their faith, in which the Arabs themselves afterwards fought for Islam.
Hence, it is evident that, as has been said, the Arabs of that period had
outgrown their religion.
SUCCESSORS OF MOHAMMED
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account