The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy — John Shaqi
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
The great simplicity of the religion of Mohammed made it possible to
effect the restoration of its pristine purity in a far higher degree
than the mighty efforts of the sixteenth and subsequent centuries could
effect a return to primitive Christianity; and besides, the conditions
of contemporary life in Arabia were not widely different from those that
had prevailed in the time of the prophet. A few of the theologians of
the Ottoman empire actually recognised the Wahhabees as orthodox. These
fanatical zealots were, however, obnoxious to the Turkish government for
more reasons than one, and hence their power was broken by Muhammed Ali
of Egypt, after a desperate struggle. Wahhabism actually exists to this
day in the interior of Arabia, but under two mutually hostile dynasties
and (in spite of having occasionally sent its emissaries as far as India)
without any great prospect of spreading. It is firmly rooted only among
the non-nomadic Arabs. The Bedouins never obey a Wahhabee ruler except
under compulsion. They are at all times loath to serve a master, and
though animated by the Moslem spirit, they are very negligent in the
performance of their religious duties. They do not even hesitate to
extort all they possibly can from pilgrim caravans, either by openly
waylaying them or by levying toll for the privilege of passing through
their territory. Taken as a whole, the life of the Bedouin of to-day
still bears a strong resemblance to that of his ancestors long ago, but
his intellectual level seems to have sunk from the height it maintained
at the time of Mohammed. Even the number of places in Arabia suitable for
agriculture appears to have diminished through the neglect and decay of
irrigation.
The fact that a few points on the coast are of some importance to
European commerce and politics is of no consequence to the country as a
whole, at least for the present.
FOOTNOTES
[1] Delitzsch, _Wo lag das Paradies_, pp. 295; 304 ff.; Schrader,
_Keilschrift und Geschichtsforschung_, pp. 202, 261.
[2] In Jeremiah iii, 2 and xxv, 24; Ezekiel xxvii, 21; xxx, 5; Jeremiah
xiii, 20 (from the end of the Captivity); Jeremiah xxi, 13, ערב
is “desert.”
[3] _Die alte Geographie Arabiens_, p. 293. Berne, 1875.
[4] Cf. S. A. Barton. _A Sketch of Semitic Origins_ (New York, 1902), Ch.
1, where the various opinions of the subject are compared.
[5] Var. Σαρακηνοί as a tribe.
[6] Cureton, _Spicilegium Syriacum_, 16 ult.
[7] The powerful Shammar of the present day, some who live in Nejd, the
ancient home of the tribe, and some in the Mesopotamian desert, belong to
the Tai.
[8] That whole peoples should be called after certain frontier tribes
by neighbouring nations is not altogether an unusual phenomenon, as
everybody knows.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account