The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
This is the history of the Parthians as given by Justin in his
abridgement of the lost work of Trogus Pompeius. Later investigations and
criticism have thrown a little light on various portions of the history,
and from the point where Justin grows briefest other Roman historians
took up the chronicles of the Parthians with avid interest. The study
of coins has also been of invaluable aid. It has seemed better to give
Justin’s account in its original fluency without interpolating criticisms
here and there. Now, however, we must make a brief presentation of
Parthian history from the start in a modern view.[a]
THE PARTHIAN EMPIRE
[Sidenote: [261-241 B.C.]]
Hellenism made no deep impression on Iran as on the West, nor did the
loose-jointed empire attain to anything higher than a Hellenistic
reproduction of the kingdom of the Achæmenians. Even in the fragmentary
records that we possess we hear from the first of rebellions little
favourable to consolidation of the realm; Seleucus, like Alexander,
still had an army of Macedonians and Persians together, while the later
Seleucids, at least in their western wars, used natives sparingly and
only as bowmen, slingers, or the like, and preferred for these services
the wild desert and mountain tribes of Iran.
Under the weak Antiochus II northeastern Iran was lost to the empire.
While the Seleucids were busy elsewhere, probably in the long war with
Ptolemy Philadelphus, which occupied Antiochus’ later years, Diodotus,
viceroy of Bactria, took the title of king. The new kingdom included
Sogdiana and Margiana from the first, while the rest of the East, with a
single exception scarcely noticed at the time, adhered to the Seleucids.
Now the formation of a strong local kingdom, heartily supported by the
Greek colonies and likely to control the neighbouring nomads and strictly
to protect its own frontiers, was by no means agreeable to the chief
of the desert tribes who, like the modern Turkomans, had been wont to
pillage the settled lands and raise blackmail with little hindrance
from the weak and distant central authority at Antioch. Accordingly two
brothers, Arsaces and Tiridates--whose tribe, the Parnians, a subdivision
of the Dahæ, had hitherto pastured their flocks in Bactria on the banks
of the Ochus--moved west into Seleucid territory near Parthia. An insult
offered to the younger brother by the satrap Pherecles moved them to
revolt; Pherecles was slain, and Parthia freed from the Macedonians.
ARSACES AND THE ARSACIDS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account