The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
Arsaces was then proclaimed first king of Parthia (250 B.C.). Such
is the later official tradition, and we possess no other account of
the beginnings of the Arsacid dynasty. But when the official account
transforms Arsaces, who according to genuine tradition was the leader of
a robber horde and of uncertain descent, into a Bactrian, the descendant
of Phriapites son of Artaxerxes II (who was called Arsaces before his
accession), and makes him conspire with his brother and five others, like
the seven who slew the false Smerdis, we detect the invention of a period
when the Arsacids had entered on the inheritance of the Achæmenians, and
imitated the order of their court. The seven conspirators are the heads
of the seven noble houses to whom, beyond doubt, the Karen, the Suren,
and the Aspahapet belonged. And further, genuine tradition does not know
the first Arsaces as king of Parthia at all, and as late as 105 B.C. the
Parthians themselves reckoned the year (autumn) 248-247 B.C. as the first
of their empire. But 248 B.C. is the year in which Arsaces I is said
to have been killed, after a reign of two years, and succeeded by his
brother; who, like all subsequent kings of the line, took the throne name
of Arsaces.
The first Arsaces must have existed, for he appears as deified on the
reverse of his brother’s drachmæ, but he was not king of Parthia. Nay,
we have authentic record that even in the epoch-year 248-247 B.C.,
the year of the accession of Tiridates, Parthia was still under the
Seleucids. These contradictions are solved by a notice of Isidore of
Charax, which names a city Asaak, not in Parthia but northwest of it, in
the neighbouring Astauene, where Arsaces was proclaimed king and where an
everlasting fire was kept burning. This, therefore, was the first seat of
the monarchy, and Pherecles was presumably satrap of Astauene, not eparch
of Parthia.
[Sidenote: [241-238 B.C.]]
The times were not favourable for the reduction of the rebels. When
Antiochus II died, the horrors that accompanied the succession of his
son Seleucus (II) Callinicus (246-226 B.C.) gave the king of Egypt the
pretext for a war, in which he overran almost the whole lands of the
Seleucids as far as Bactria. Meantime a civil war was raging between
Seleucus and his brother Antiochus Hierax, whom the Galatians supported,
and at the great battle of Ancyra in 242 or 241 B.C. Seleucus was totally
defeated and thought to be slain. At this news Arsaces Tiridates, whom
the genuine tradition still represents as a brave robber-chief, broke
into Parthia at the head of the Parnians, slew the Macedonian eparch
Andragoras, and took possession of the province. These Parnian Dahæ, in
consequence of eternal dissensions, had migrated at a remote date to
Hyrcania and the desert adjoining the Caspian. Here, and in great measure
even after they conquered Parthia, they retained the peculiarities of
Scythian nomads.
PARTHIAN CUSTOMS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account