The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
It follows then that there are only a few of the archbishoprics
and bishoprics of Italy which at all stand out in general history.
♦Relation to the Roman See.♦ The growth of the Roman see also more
distinctly overshadowed the Italian bishops than it did those of other
lands. ♦Rivals of Rome.♦ The bishoprics which have most historical
importance are those which at one time or another stood out in rivalry
or opposition to Rome. ♦Milan. | Aquileia.♦ Such was the great see of
_Milan_, whose province took in a crowd of Lombard bishoprics; such was
the patriarchal see of _Aquileia_, whose metropolitan jurisdiction took
in Como at one end and the Istrian Pola at the other. The patriarchs of
Aquileia, standing as they did on the march of the Italian, Teutonic,
and Slavonic lands, grew, unlike most of the Italian prelates,
into powerful temporal princes. ♦Ravenna.♦ _Ravenna_ was the head
of a smaller province than either Milan or Aquileia; but _Ravenna_
too stands out as one of the churches which kept up for a while an
independent position in the face of the growing power of Rome. Milan
and Ravenna, in short, never lost the memory of their Imperial days;
and Aquileia took advantage, first of a theological difference, and
secondly of its temporal position as the great border see.
♦The immediate Roman Province.♦
In the rest of Italy the case is different. Rome herself was the
immediate head of a large province stretching from sea to sea.
Within this the _suburbicarian_ sees, those close around Rome, stood
in a special and closer relation to the patriarchal see itself.
♦Metropolitan sees of central Italy.♦ The famous cities of _Genoa_,
_Bologna_, _Pisa_, _Florence_, and _Sienna_, were also metropolitan
sees, though their ecclesiastical dignity is quite overshadowed by
their civic greatness. _Lucca_ has been added to the same list in
modern times. ♦Pisa and Genoa.♦ The provinces of Pisa and Genoa
are notable as having been extended into the island of Corsica
after its recovery from the Saracens. The history and extent of the
Italian dioceses is, with these few exceptions, a matter almost
wholly of local ecclesiastical concern. ♦The southern province.♦ In
the south and in Sicily the endless archiepiscopal sees preserve
the names of some famous cities, as _Capua_—the later Capua on the
site of Casilinum—_Tarentum_, _Bari_, and others. But some even of
the metropolitan churches are fixed in places of quite secondary
importance, and the simple bishoprics are endless.
§ 3. _The Ecclesiastical Divisions of Gaul and Germany._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account