The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
By taking a single view of the ecclesiastical arrangements of the whole
of the Western Empire on this side of the Alps and the Pyrenees, some
instructive lessons may be learned. Such a way of looking at the map
will bring out more strongly the differences between bishoprics of
earlier and later foundation. ♦Gaulish and German dioceses.♦ And, if
we take the name of Gaul in the old geographical sense, taking in the
German lands west of the Rhine which formed part of the older Empire,
we shall find that several ecclesiastical provinces may be called
either Gaulish or German. With the boundaries of the French kingdom we
have no concern, except so far as the boundary between the Eastern and
Western kingdoms of the Franks did to some extent follow ecclesiastical
lines. Modern annexations of course have had no regard to them.
♦Province of South Gaul.♦
On first crossing the Alps from Italy, we find the ecclesiastical
phænomena of Italy continued in the lands nearest to it. The two
provinces of _Tarantaise_ (answering to the civil division of _Alpes
Penninæ_) and _Embrun_ (_Alpes Maritimæ_) which take in the mountain
region between Italy and Gaul, are of small size, though of course in
the actual mountain lands the bishoprics are less thick on the ground.
♦Tarantaise.♦ The Tarantasian province contained only three suffragan
sees, _Sitten_, _Aosta_, and _St. John of Maurienne_, three bishoprics
which now belong to three distinct political powers. ♦Embrun.♦ But
in the southern part of the province of Embrun, which reaches to the
sea, the bishops’ sees are thick on the ground, just as they are in
Italy. ♦Aix and Arles.♦ So they are in the small provinces of _Aix_
(_Narbonensis Secunda_) and _Arles_. But, as soon as we get out of
Provence into the parts of Gaul which were less thoroughly Romanized,
and where cities, and consequently bishoprics, lay less close together,
the phænomena of the ecclesiastical map begin to change. ♦Vienne.
| Narbonne.♦ The Provençal provinces of Aix and Aries are bounded to
the north and west by those of _Vienne_ (which with Arles answers
nearly to the civil _Viennensis_) and _Narbonne_ (answering nearly to
_Narbonensis Secunda_). These provinces are of much greater size, and
the suffragan sees are much further apart. ♦Auch.♦ To the west lies
_Auch_, answering to the oldest Aquitaine or _Novempopulana_, and to
the north of these, in the remainder of Gaul, the original provinces
are of still greater size. Most of them answer very nearly to the older
civil divisions. ♦Bourges, Bourdeaux, Lyons, Rouen, Tours, and Sens.♦
_Aquitania Prima_ is the province of _Bourges_, _Aquitania Secunda_
that of _Bourdeaux_. _Lugdunensis Prima_, _Secunda_, _Tertia_, and
_Quarta_, answer to _Lyons_, _Rouen_, _Tours_, and _Sens_. Of these
Lyons, as having been the temporal capital, became the seat of the
Primate of all the Gauls. The province of Rouen too answers very
nearly to the duchy of which that metropolis became the capital; its
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account