The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
marriage, this and that treaty, is surely an anachronism on the face
of modern Europe. Germany and Italy are nations as well as powers.
Austria, changed from the _Austria_ of Germany into the _Neustria_ of
Hungary, is simply a name without a meaning.
* * * * *
We have thus gone through the geographical changes of the three
Imperial kingdoms, and of the states and powers which were formed
by parts of those kingdoms falling away, and in some cases uniting
themselves with lands beyond the Empire. They have all to some extent
kept a common history down to our own time. We have now to turn to
another land which parted off from the Empire in like manner, but which
parted off so early as to become a wholly separate and rival land, with
an altogether independent history of its own.
FOOTNOTES:
[12] Unless we except the small part of Flanders held by the
Confederation.
[13] On the marks, see Waitz, _Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichten_, vii.
62, et seq.
[14] No influence was more powerful for this end than the _Zollverein_
or customs union, which gradually united most of the German states
for certain purposes. But as it did not affect the boundaries or the
governments of sovereign states, it hardly concerns geography. Neither
do the strivings after more perfect union in 1848 and the following
years.
[15] Compare the mention of Rudolf in the letter of Cnut, on his Roman
Pilgrimage, in Florence of Worcester, 1031. He is there ‘Rodulphus rex,
qui maxime ipsarum clausurarum dominatur.’
[16] That Aosta was strictly Burgundian appears from the ‘Divisio
Imperii, 806’ (Pertz, Leges, i. 141), where Italy is granted whole
to Pippin, Burgundy is divided between Charles and Lewis; but it is
provided that both Charles and Lewis shall have success to Italy,
‘Karolus per vallem Augustanam quæ ad regnum ejus pertinet.’ The
Divisio Imperii of 839 is still plainer (Pertz, Leges, i. 373,
Scriptores, i. 434). There the one share takes in ‘Regnum Italiæ
partemque Burgundiæ, id est, vallem Augustanam,’ and certain other
districts. So Einhard (Vita Karoli, 15) excludes Aosta from Italy.
‘Italia tota, quæ ab Augusta Prætoria usque in Calabriam inferiorem, in
qua Græcorum et Beneventanorum constat esse confinia, porrigitur.’ As
Calabria was not part of Italy in this sense, so neither was Aosta.
[17] See Waitz, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte, iv. 73.
CHAPTER IX.
THE KINGDOM OF FRANCE.
♦Origin and growth of France.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account