The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
The process by which a great power grew up to the west of the Western
Empire has something in common with the process by which the powers
spoken of in the later sections of the last Chapter split off from the
Western Empire. As in the case of Switzerland and the United Provinces,
so in the case of France, a land which had formed part of the dominions
of Charles the Great became independent of his successors. ♦Comparison
with Austria.♦ As in the case of Austria to the east, so in the case
of France to the west, a duchy of the old Empire grew into a power
distinct from the Empire, and tried to attach to itself the old
Imperial titles and traditions. ♦Different nature of the Austrian and
the French territories.♦ But there is more than one point of difference
between the two cases. As a matter of geography, the power of the
Austrian house has for some centuries largely rested on the possession
of dominions beyond the boundaries of the Carolingian Empire, while
it has been only for a moment, and that chiefly by the annexation of
territory from Austria itself, that France has ever held any European
possessions beyond the Carolingian frontier.[18] ♦Difference in the
process of separation.♦ But the true difference lies in the date and
circumstances of the separation. ♦The other powers split off after
the Empire has become German.♦ The Swabian, Lotharingian, Frisian,
and Austrian lands which gradually split off from the Empire to form
distinct states split off after the Empire had been finally annexed to
the crown of Germany, indeed after Germany and the Empire had come to
mean nearly the same thing. But France can hardly be said to have split
off from the German kingdom or from the Empire itself. The first prince
of the Western _Francia_ who bore the kingly title was indeed the man
of the King of the East-Franks.[19] But no lasting relation, such as
afterwards bound the princes of the Empire to its head, sprang out of
his homage. Again from 887 to 963 the Imperial dignity was not finally
attached to any one kingdom. It fluctuated between Germany and Italy;
it might have passed to Burgundy; it might have passed to Karolingia,
as it had once already done in the person of Charles the Bald. ♦The
Empire divided into four kingdoms, of which three are again united,
while one remains distinct.♦ The truer way of putting the matter is to
say that in 887 the Empire split up into four kingdoms, of which three
came together again, and formed the Empire in a new shape. The fourth
kingdom remained separate; it can hardly be said to have split off
from the Empire, but its separation hindered the full reconstruction
of the Empire. It has had a distinct history, a history which made
it the special rival of the Empire. ♦Karolingia receives the name of
_France_.♦ This was _Karolingia_, the kingdom of the West-Franks, to
which, through the results of the change of dynasty in 987, the name of
_France_ gradually came to be applied.
♦France a nation as well as a power.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account