The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
P. 450, l. 5 from bottom. It is quite accurate to say that the Turk
has never ruled at Tzetinje. It is perfectly true that the Turk has
more than once harried Montenegro and Tzetinje itself; the Turk
has professed to consider the land as included in a pashalik; but
Montenegro has never been a regularly and avowedly tributary state, as
Servia and Roumania were, as free Bulgaria is still.
P. 452, l. 7 from bottom. The promises of Europe on this head still
remain unfulfilled (January 1881). It is hardly needful to notice the
diplomatic quibble that the European order for the liberation of these
lands was not contained in the document strictly called the Treaty of
Berlin, but in another paper signed at the same time and place. The
order has been renewed during the present year at the Second Berlin
Conference.
P. 492, side-note. For ‘and’ read ‘under.’
P. 529, l. 9 from bottom. For ‘western’ read ‘eastern.’
P. 554, side-note. For ‘Northerners,’ read ‘Northmen.’
HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPE.
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTION.
♦Definition of Historical Geography.♦
The work which we have now before us is to trace out the extent of
territory which the different states and nations of Europe and the
neighbouring lands have held at different times in the world’s history,
to mark the different boundaries which the same country has had, and
the different meanings in which the same name has been used. It is of
great importance carefully to make these distinctions, because great
mistakes as to the facts of history are often caused through men
thinking and speaking as if the names of different countries, say for
instance England, France, Burgundy, Austria, have always meant exactly
the same extent of territory. Historical geography, in this sense,
differs from physical geography which regards the natural features of
the earth’s surface. It differs also from studies like ethnology and
comparative philology, which have to do directly with the differences
between one nation and another, with their movements from one part
of the world to another, and with the relations to be found among
the languages spoken by them. But, though it is distinct from these
studies, it makes much use of them. For the physical geography of a
country always has a great effect upon its political history, and
the dispersions and movements of different nations are exactly those
parts of history which have most to do with fixing the names and the
boundaries of different countries at different times. _England_, for
instance, is, in strictness, the land of the English wherever they
may settle, whether in their old home on the European continent,
or in the isle of Britain, or in New England beyond the Ocean. But
the extent of territory which was in this way to become England was
largely determined by the physical circumstances of the countries in
which the English settled. And the history of the English nation has
been influenced, above all things, by the fact that the great English
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account