The Historical Jesus: A Survey of PositionsRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
The Historical Jesus: A Survey of Positions
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Jesus Christ -- Historicity; Jesus Christ -- Rationalistic interpretations
Exactly. Jesus, in effect, preached just what the Baptist is said
to have preached; only without baptism. The monition to repent was
simply the monition of all the prophets and all the eschatologists;
and it had not the attraction of baptism which the evangel of the
Baptist was said to have. So that the Twelve, on the showing of
M. Loisy, went through Jewry uttering only one familiar phrase--and
casting out devils--and dooming those who refused to hear them. And,
by their own report, it was in casting out devils that they had
their success. The simple name of Jesus, according to the Gospels,
availed for that where he had never appeared in person. Yet, again,
the name is used by non-adherents for the same purpose (Mk. ix,
38). And still M. Loisy confidently claims that there is no trace of
a pre-Christian Jesus cult in Palestine! [177]
Concerning the nullity of the original evangel he is quite unwittingly
explicit when he is resisting the myth theory; albeit in the act of
contradicting himself:--
Paul, indeed, proclaims [se réclame du] an immortal Christ, or
more exactly a Christ dead and re-arisen, not the Jesus preaching
the evangel in Galilee and at Jerusalem. But his attitude is easy
to explain.... He was aware of the circumstances of the death of
Christ, and of what was preached by his followers.... If he boasted
of having learned nothing from the old [sic] apostles, it was that,
in reality, he had never been at their school.... But he was able
[il lui arrive] also to affirm the conformity of his teaching
with theirs: that is what he did in the passage ... touching the
death and resurrection of Jesus. Paul converted had nothing to
demand of the first apostles of Jesus, because he knew already
what they had preached. [178]
So that the doctrine of an immortal or resurrected Christ was the
sole doctrine of the Apostles. There was no other evangel. And this
doctrine, which had just been declared to be born of the personal
impression made by Jesus on his followers, is also the doctrine of
Paul, who had never seen Jesus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account