The Historical Jesus: A Survey of PositionsRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
The Historical Jesus: A Survey of Positions
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Jesus Christ -- Historicity; Jesus Christ -- Rationalistic interpretations
Frederick Barbarossa anciently desolated this city; his vengeance
spared neither the inhabitants, nor the edifices, nor the
walls; but that was nothing in comparison with the evils we now
suffer. The barbarism of an enemy is less insupportable than the
unjust cruelty of a friend ... our miseries have endured more
than a month; they increase every hour; and, like the damned,
we suffer, without hope, evils which before this time of calamity
we believed to be beyond human endurance. [93]
Guicciardini testifies that the Spaniards of the emperor's forces
had been more cruel than the Germans, [94] violating the women and
reducing to rags the men of their own allies.
CHAPTER XI
THE LOGIA THEORY AND THE HISTORICAL TEXT
So much for the "especially remarkable" fact that churches were
desecrated in the sack of Rome in 1527, and that Savonarola should
in 1496 have predicted such things for his own day. We have seen
that his prediction was not a forecast of the event, that he had no
idea of the causation of the ultimate sack of Rome, that he really
prophesied an early event, and that he was simply announcing speedy
divine vengeance after the manner of the Hebrew and many previous
Christian prophets. What ground for argument, then, does his case
furnish for an inference as to the date of the quasi-prophecy of the
fall of Jerusalem in the third Gospel? Blass, despite his "especially
remarkable" argument, puts his case pretty low:--
Accidentally, you will say, the event [in 1527] corresponded with
the prophecy. But that is not my point, whether it was accidental,
or the prophet had really foreseen the event; for in the case of
the prophecies recorded by Luke you may raise the same controversy
if you like. [95]
What then were the manner and the matter of the prophecy in Luke? The
Messiah expressly grounds his prediction upon the non-acceptance by
Jerusalem of him and his mission:--
If thou [Jerusalem] hadst only known in this day the things which
belong unto peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes. For the
days shall come upon thee when thine enemies shall cast up a bank
about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,
and shall dash thee to the ground, and thy children within thee;
and they shall not leave in thee one stone on another (Luke xix,
42-44).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account