The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2Müller, Karl Otfried
History
The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2
Müller, Karl Otfried
Dorians -- History; Greece -- Antiquities, Dorian; Greece -- History -- Dorian Invasions, approximately 1125-1025 B.C.
4. It cannot be expected that we should here enter into a minute
examination of all the peculiarities of the Doric dialect: the following
brief remarks will, it is hoped, be received as an attempt rather to set
forth the most remarkable features of the spoken language, than to explain
the niceties of the polished style used in writing and poetry. The
frequent use of Α prevailed indeed partially in the ancient dialect, and
in most cases the use of Η originated in the Ionic, which in this respect
bore nearly the same relation to the ancient Greek as the English language
does to the German.(1931) The broad pronunciation (πλατειασμὸς) of the
Dorians frequently, however, exceeded that of the ancient language, as may
be seen from the Latin. Thus φαγὸς, _fagus_—φάμα, _fama_—μᾶλον,
_malum_—ἀρχᾶς, _terras_ (genit.) κᾶρυξ, (_caduceus_), and the like, are
clearly the genuine ancient forms. On the other hand, the change from Α to
Η in the temporal augment existed in the most ancient Greek, as is evident
from _ago_, _ēgi_, _ἦγον_, _capio_, _cēpi_, &c. The Doric dialect,
however, here also used Α in the place of Η. I am not aware whether
another change very nearly coinciding with the latter has ever been
noticed, viz. the frequent use of the short Α for Η, especially in the
enclitics, as κᾶ (which however is long) for κε or ἂν, a form common to
all the Dorians, and in the same manner γα for γε,(1932) κα for the
correlative τε in τόκα, πόκα, ὅκα in Sophron, Theocritus, and others, to
which corresponds θα in πρόσθα, ἐξύπισθα (Alcman), ἔμπροσθα, ἄνωθα.(1933)
The same change is also observable in ἅτερος for ἕτερος, τράφω for
τρέπω,(1934) Αρταμις(1935) for Αρτεμις, τάως, παραιτέρω, in the Cretan
dialect,(1936) τάμνω in the Heraclean Tables and elsewhere, σκιαρὸς,
φρασὶν, in Pindar; and innumerable examples of a similar kind. Η, either
as a contraction of ΕΕ, or a lengthening of Ε, occurs in many instances in
the place of ΕΙ in the other dialects (the reverse took place among the
Bœotians), as in ποίη, πλήων, μήων,(1937) ὄρηος, Λύκηος (Alcman), κοσμῆν,
κατοικῆν (Theocritus, and the Byzantine Decree in Demosthenes(1938)),
δήρας for δείρας in the treaty of the Latians in Crete,(1939) χῆρες in
Cretan, and also used by Alcman, κῆνος or τῆνος in Alcman and others;
πεπόνθης, ἀπολώλη Theocritus and the Heraclean tables: and thus in
contractions from ΑΕΙ, Η has frequently preponderated over Α, as in the
pure Doric form ὁρῆν,(1940) ἡ καρδία παδῆ Sophron;(1941) although it must
also be allowed that the diphthong ΑΕ was contracted into Η, as in ὅρη,
&c. ἦραι for ἆραι,(1942) and ἐνίκη for ἐνίκαε in a Laconian inscription in
Leake’s Morea, vol. III. Inscript. n. 71.:(1943) to which instances we
should probably add the following cases of crasis, κἠν, κἠπὶ, κἠκ. The
reverse of this, which we find in the words πει in Sophron,(1944) and ὅπει
in a Corcyrean inscription(1945) for πῆ and ὄπη, is a remarkable variety.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account