The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2Müller, Karl Otfried
History
The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2
Müller, Karl Otfried
Dorians -- History; Greece -- Antiquities, Dorian; Greece -- History -- Dorian Invasions, approximately 1125-1025 B.C.
hence the Laconian forms κτίτταρ for κτίστης, ἐττὰν for ἐς τὰν, ἀμπίτταρ
for ἀμφιστὰς,(1958) ἀκκὸρ for ἀσκὸς.(1959) Valckenær lays down the
following rule: “_literam_ Σ _Lacones in sequentem consonantem non
liquidam mutant_;” and of this change he finds traces in the Tarentine
dialect, to which we may add, that Hecate, according to Hesychius, was
there called ἄφραττος, _i.e._ ἄφραστος. The most interesting example of
this change in the Spartan dialect is the form ἄττασι for ἀνάστηθι
(derived from ΑΝΤΤΑΣΙ), in which word more than three Laconisms are
discernible. With this point is immediately connected the change of Ζ,
_i.e._ ΣΔ into ΔΔ, for instance in verbs in ζω, _Laconice_—δδω, many
instances of which occur in the Lysistrata and Acharneans of Aristophanes.
There is no evidence of the same change occurring in verbs whose
characteristic is Γ; although the Dorians were induced by analogy and a
partiality to the letter Ξ to introduce the termination ξω, where the
characteristic letter was not Γ but Δ, which is evident by the formation
of the substantive καθίππαξις (as should be read in Hesychius for
καθίπταξις), δεικηλίκτας, &c.(1960) Even in the Laconian dialect, however,
the soft sound of ΣΔ is used instead of ΔΔ, as ἀγίσδεο, μελισδόμενος,
τράπεσδα in Alcman, and in the pretended apophthegm of Lycurgus, ἂν πτωχοὶ
μένητε καὶ μὴ μέσδω (_i.e._ μείζω) ἅτερος θατέρω ἐράῃ κτῆμεν.(1961) It
would however be erroneous to suppose, with regard to the mode in which
this transition was effected, that the sound of Ζ, when already formed,
passed into ΔΔ or ΣΔ. The ancient dialect appears to have had a separate
Δ, pronounced with a peculiar compression of the mouth; the Dorians in
several cases, agreeing with the Ionians, added the Σ, and formed either
Ζ, where the sounds were more combined, or ΣΔ. In other cases the Dorians
merely gave additional force to the Δ. With the Æolians there was scarce
any distinction between the harsh and the common Δ, as in Δεὺς for Ζεὺς,
δυγὸς for ζυγὸς &c.; in the same manner Ζεὺς in the Latin became _Deus_,
ῥίζα _radix_, ὄζω _odor_,(1962) and hence the long Ζ was wanting in that
language; but the peculiarity of the original sounds of this consonant is
evident from the circumstance that the Latins substituted for it I; for
example in _jugum_ from ζυγὸς, _major_ from μείζων, &c.; in like manner
the Æolic dialect interchanged δια and ζα, καρζὰ, καρδία.(1963) The change
of the last letters of verbs ending in -σσω into -ζω in the Tarentine
dialect, instead of ττω like the other Dorians, as ἀνάζω for ἀνάσσω, is
quite peculiar to that town.(1964)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account