The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2Müller, Karl Otfried
History
The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2
Müller, Karl Otfried
Dorians -- History; Greece -- Antiquities, Dorian; Greece -- History -- Dorian Invasions, approximately 1125-1025 B.C.
starting “_E.g._ besides.”]), it is sometimes doubtful which party
borrowed from the other. Thus Alcman uses πόλτος for _puls_; are we to
suppose that this word was so early brought over from Italy? Κάρκαρον is
used for “prison” by Sophron, for “stall” by Rhinthon: it is the same word
as the Latin _carcer_; but possibly _both_ are derived from the Laconian
word γέργυρα in Alcman. That the Italian _Heracleans_ should have
preserved the ancient language and writing to the fifth century after the
building of Rome so faithfully as the famous Heraclean Tables show us, is
very remarkable. At _Syracuse_ the dialect was nearly the same as that in
which Epicharmus and Sophron wrote: the laws of Diocles too were probably
drawn up in this dialect, but the circumstance of their requiring an
interpreter in the time of Timoleon is a proof of the rapid preponderance
of the Attic language in this city (B. III. ch. 9. § 7.). The language of
Sophron is also nearer to the common dialect, and less strictly Doric than
that spoken in Peloponnesus in his time; _e.g._, he always says τοὺς and
not τώς. On the spreading of the Doric dialect in Sicily see Castelli
Proleg. p. 25. We have not as yet touched on the _Delphic_ dialect, the
strong Doric character of which is proved by an inscription (Boeckh No.
1690.) in which ὀδελοὶ and τέτορες occur, and still more, as I believe, by
a monument of Olymp. 100. 1, which has futures such as ὀρκεξέω &c., the
infinitives ἀπογράψεν, φέρεν, and θύεν, αἴκα for ἐὰν, πάντεσσι,
ἱερομναμόνεσσι, διακάτιοι, ἐπικοσμήσωντι, ἐν for ἐς _adverbialiter_,
καττὰν, ἐνιαύτιος, πέμπωντι, ποττὸν (Boeckh No. 1688.). Besides this, all
the prose oracles given at Delphi were doubtless written in Doric; as
_e.g._ that in Demosth. in Mid. p. 531, and in Macart. p. 1072, that in
Thuc. V. 16. (—ἀργυρέᾳ εὐλάκᾳ εὐλάξειν, is, according to the scholiast, a
Laconian expression), and the oracle quoted in vol. I. p. 199. note p, ποῖ
τὺ λαβὼν καὶ ποῖ τὺ καθίξων καὶ ποῖ τὺ οἴκησιν (here the sense requires
ἀσφαλέως ἕξεις, ἐρωτᾷς, κελεύω...) ἁλιέα τε κεκλῆσθαι, which, however, was
probably written in hexameters, since the epic oracles sometimes show
traces of Dorisms (Herod. IV. 155, 157; compare that given to the
Lacedæmonians, ἁ φιλοχρηματία &c.). Plutarch (Pyth. Orac. 24. p. 289.)
quotes from ancient oracles the expression πυρίκαοι (_i.e._ πυρκέοι, as
the Delphians themselves were called, vol. I. p. 254. note b), ὀρεάνας for
ἄνδρας,(1983) ὀρεμπότας for ποτάμους; likewise κραταίπους (Schol. Pind.
Olymp. XIII. 114.) is probably from an oracle: from the Dorisms of the
vulgar dialect we have Γυγάδας for the treasure of Gyges, Herod. I. 14, a
half-adjective form in -ας, which occurs frequently in Doric, and ἅρμα for
ἀρμὴ, “love,” Plutarch Amator, 23. The name of the month Βύσιος (ap.
Plutarch Quæst. Gr. 9. and in Delphian inscriptions) was derived by some
from Φύσιος, as being a spring-month; it is, however, far more probable
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account