The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2Müller, Karl Otfried
History
The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2
Müller, Karl Otfried
Dorians -- History; Greece -- Antiquities, Dorian; Greece -- History -- Dorian Invasions, approximately 1125-1025 B.C.
57 III. 21. 6. cf. 26. 6. The other six were at the time of Pausanias
either again comprised in Messenia, as Pharæ, which Augustus had
annexed to Laconia, Paus. IV. 30. 2. after it had at an earlier
period been separated with Thuria and Abea from Messenia, Polyb.
XXV, 1. 1, or they had fallen to decay, and were then uninhabited,
as Pephnos, Helos, Cyphanta, and Leucæ. Whether Abea was included by
Augustus in Laconia is doubtful, but it is probable from the
situation of the place. This, with the other five mentioned above,
would therefore make the number twenty-four complete. As proofs of
the late independence of these towns we may mention decrees of Abea,
Geronthræ, Gytheium, Œtylus, and Tænarus (Boeckh Corp. Inscript.
Nos. 1307, 1334, 1325, 1336, 1391, 1392, 1323, 1321, 1322, 1393,
1394). There are also inscriptions of the Eleutherolacones jointly,
τὸ κοινὸν τῶν Ἑλευθερολακώνων (ib. 1389). Likewise, according to
Eckhel, there are genuine coins, belonging to this and the Roman
period, of Asine, Asopus, BϾ, Gytheium, and Las; those of Taletum
and Cythera are doubtful.
58 Pausan. III. 26. 5. Sparta must, however, have retained some outlet
to the sea. The Lacedæmonian coast is also called the territory of
the Periœci in Thucyd. III. 16.
59 Thucyd. I. 101. The Θουριᾶται of Thuria, near Calamæ. Welcker
(Alcmanis Fragment, p. 87.) proposes Αἰθαίῳ for Ληθαίῳ in Theognis
v. 1216. Bekker.
60 Androtion ap. Steph. Byz. in v.
61 See also in Αἰτωλία. They are also mentioned by Strabo, VIII. p.
362. (Eustath. ad Il. B. p. 293, 19. ad Dion. Perieg. 418). They had
not however any connexion with the Hecatombæa; for Argos had the
same festival.
62 See book I. ch. 7. § 16. Lysias ap. Harpocrat. also calls Anthana a
Lacedæmonian city. See _Æginetica_, p. 46, note q, p. 185. note v.
Siebelis ad Pausan. II. 38. 6.
63 Book I. ch. 5. § 10.
64 See Manso, Sparta, vol. I. p. 93. Tittmann, vol. I. p. 89. That even
the Lacedæmonian πλῆθος did not comprise the Periœci, is shown,
_e.g._, by Polybius IV. 34. 7, where it rejects the alliance of the
Ætolians, chiefly on account of the fear that they would
ἐξανδραποδίζεσθαι τοὺς Περιοίκους. The name Λακεδαιμόνιοι, which
signifies all, Periœci and Spartans, and frequently the former, as
the early inhabitants, in opposition to the latter, is no more a
proof of political equality than the appellation Θεσσαλοὶ of the
freedom of the Penestæ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account