The History of a Lie: "The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion" — John Shaqi
The History of a Lie: "The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion"Bernstein, Herman
History
The History of a Lie: "The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion"
Bernstein, Herman
Jews; Protocols of the wise men of Zion
Nilus, “the Russian mystic,” is credited with several versions of how he
had secured the Protocols, and his stories flatly contradict one
another. In 1905 he said that the Protocols were given to him by a
prominent Russian conservative whose name he did not mention, and who in
turn had received them from an unnamed woman who had stolen them from
“one of the most influential leaders of Freemasonry at the close of a
secret meeting of the initiated in France.” Then, several years later,
Nilus wrote that his friend himself had stolen the Protocols from “the
headquarters of the Society of Zion in France.” Several years
afterwards, in a new edition of his book, Nilus said that the
“Protocols” came from Switzerland and not from France. This time he
named his Russian conservative friend, Sukhotin, who had died in the
meantime. He added that the Protocols were not Jewish-Masonic but
Zionist documents secretly read at the Zionist Congress in Basle in
1897.
Then followed a new edition of the Nilus book bearing the date of 1917.
A translation of this edition has recently appeared in this country,
containing a brand-new explanation as to how the Protocols were rescued
and given to the world. This explanation is taken from the German
version published in Charlottenburg. The introduction to that edition
says that the Protocols, having been read from day to day at the Basle
Congress, were sent as read to Frankfort on the Main. The disclosure of
them came through the infidelity of the messenger.
The 1917 edition is published with a prologue and an epilogue, like a
drama, which indeed it is, with all the ingredients of melodrama—a
villain, a mysterious woman, a Grand Duke, a conspiracy to destroy the
world, and a saint—Nilus, who convicts himself in his own writings of
falsification in the giving of these various accounts of how the
Protocols came into his possession.
Nothing is known of Sergius Nilus. Russian standard reference books and
encyclopedias contain no mention of his name.
The anonymous American editor of the Nilus book gives the following
information about Nilus:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account