The History of Ancient America, Anterior to the Time of Columbus: Proving the Identity of the Aborigines with the Tyrians and Israelites; and the Introduction of Christianity into the Western Hemisphere By The Apostle St. ThomasJones, George
History
The History of Ancient America, Anterior to the Time of Columbus: Proving the Identity of the Aborigines with the Tyrians and Israelites; and the Introduction of Christianity into the Western Hemisphere By The Apostle St. Thomas
Jones, George
America -- Antiquities; America -- Discovery and exploration -- Phoenician; Indians -- Origin
The subjugation of Tyrus by _policy_ was one of the schemes of
Alexander,--for avoiding its destruction,--he would then be sure of
Navies, Pilots, and Mariners, to carry his warfare, at a later period,
to the river Tiber and to Rome itself;--for his thirst of
Conquest,--had it not been allayed by the poison-draught in
Asia,--could only have been quenched within the great Capital of
Italy. Alexander, therefore, flattered the Tyrians by raising to the
throne of Sidon, a man who bore the same name,--(Strato) and was of
the same family as the Founder of the present dynasty at Tyrus; and
consequently, remotely related to Azelmic, whom Alexander endeavoured
(by this act of apparent generosity) to circumvent and overthrow by
_policy_, not warfare. Historians have applauded the justice of
Hephæstion,--they should have analyzed the deep-laid scheming of his
Master,--who merely employed his favourite, to mask his own deep
intent upon the great Commercial emporium of the World. The Tyrians,
however, were practical _merchant-princes_, and were not to be
deceived by any species of _exchange_, although Kings were the
commodity.
334 B. C.] The unforeseen capitulation of Sidon,--the
Mother-land,--aroused the Tyrians to a sense of their own
position,--Sidon, Byblos, and Aradnus, had surrendered,--these
Capitals, therefore, could not aid the Merchant-Metropolis. To
increase the apprehension of the Tyrians, it was reported through the
continued policy of Alexander, that he was, also, attended by a fleet
of Galleys to cover any retreat,--or to land, and reconvey his troops
from, or to any point, from the Bosphorous to the Nile,--or from
thence to Carthage. The Conqueror had, however, in reality, dismissed
his fleet before the victory of Issus, in order to inspire his troops
with additional courage, from the then apparent fact, that they had no
means of retreat from the enemies' country by the means of Galleys. He
must have remembered that that feeling of safety of retreat lost the
Persians the Battle of Marathon. [490 B. C.] The Macedonian had
another motive in reporting that his fleet was approaching,--viz., To
take the Tyrian attention from any land defence, by enforcing the
belief that the attack would be by means of the Navy. He knew, also,
that Azelmic and his People had no extensive knowledge of _Military_
Science,--for they could have no occasion for its exercise, occasioned
by their Island locality,--their high-reared walls being their
bulwarks:--and they consequently commenced, as he expected,
preparations for a Naval Conflict:--but, unknown to Alexander they had
formed a masterly design, viz., to attack him both by land and sea,
and that simultaneously; thence, if the Macedonian lost a land battle,
and his fleet dispersed, (no difficult matter for the Tyrians) it
would be easy to arouse other nations to crush the Invader. Tyrus,
however, had no army fit to cope with Alexander, in any general
engagement, and especially with his Phalanx and Cavalry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account