The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
The desire which he had of imitating in every respect the conduct of
Christ, suggested to him the idea of practising medicine as a work of
charity and benevolence. He began, as was then the custom of the time,
by studying the art of healing in the writings of the ancients. He
read the works of Hippocrates and Galen with avidity; and made himself
so well acquainted with their opinions, that he astonished all the
medical men by the profundity of his knowledge. But as his taste for
mysticism was insatiable, he soon became disgusted with the writings
of the Greeks; an accident led him to abandon them for ever. Happening
to take up the glove of a young girl afflicted with the _itch_, he
caught that disagreeable disease. The Galenists whom he consulted,
attributed it to the combustion of the bile, and the saline state of
the phlegm. They prescribed a course of purgatives which weakened him
considerably, without effecting a cure. This circumstance disgusted him
with the system of the humorists, and led him to form the resolution of
reforming medicine, as Paracelsus had done. The works of this reformer,
which he read with attention, awakened in him a spirit of reformation,
but did not satisfy him; because his knowledge, being much greater
than that of Paracelsus, he could not avoid despising the disgusting
egotism, and the ridiculous ignorance of that fanatic. Though he had
already refused a canonicate, he took the degree of doctor of medicine,
in 1599, and afterwards travelled through the greatest part of France
and Italy; and he assures us, that during his travels, he performed
a great number of cures. On his return, he married a rich Brabantine
lady, by whom he had several children; among others a son, afterwards
celebrated under the name of Francis Mercurius, who edited his father’s
works, and who went a good deal further than his father had done, in
all the branches of theosophy. Van Helmont passed the rest of his
life on his estate at Vilvorde, almost constantly occupied with the
processes of his laboratory. He died in the year 1644, on the 13th of
December, at six o’clock in the evening, after having nearly reached
the age of sixty-seven years.
The system of Van Helmont has for its basis the opinions of the
spiritualists. He arranged even the influence of evil genii, the
efforts of sorcerers, and the power of magicians among the causes which
produce diseases. The archeus of Paracelsus constituted one of the
capital points of his theory; but he ascribed to it a more substantial
nature than Paracelsus had done. This archeus is independent of
the elements; it has no form; for form constitutes the object of
generation, or of production. These ideas are obviously borrowed
from the ancients. The _form_ of Aristotle is not the μορφη, but the
ενεργεια (_the power of acting_) which matter does not possess.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account