The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
All the medicines which were then in vogue as solvents of urinary
calculi had a greater or less resemblance to caustic potash or soda;
substances so acrid, when in a concentrated state, that in a short time
they reduce the fleshy parts of the animal body to a mere pulp. Thus,
though they might possess lithontriptic properties, their exhibition
was dangerous, if in unskilful hands. They all seemed to derive their
efficacy from quicklime, which again derives its power from the fire.
It was therefore very natural for them to ascribe its power to igneous
matter imbibed from the fire, retained by the lime, and communicated by
it to alkalies, which it renders powerfully acrid. Hence, undoubtedly,
the term _caustic_ applied to the alkalies in that state, and hence
also the _acidum pingue_ of Mayer, which was a peculiar state of fire.
It appears from Dr. Black’s note-books, that he originally entertained
the opinion, that caustic alkalies acquired igneous matter from
quicklime. In one of them he hints at some way of catching this matter
as it escapes from lime, while it becomes mild by exposure to the
air; but on the opposite blank page is written, “Nothing escapes--the
cup rises considerably by absorbing air.” A few pages further on,
he compares the loss of weight sustained by an ounce of chalk when
calcined, with its loss while dissolved in muriatic acid. Immediately
after this, a medical case is mentioned, which occurred in November,
1752. Hence it would appear, that he had before that time suspected the
real cause of the difference between limestone and burnt lime. He had
prosecuted his inquiry with vigour; for the experiments with magnesia
are soon after mentioned.
These experiments laid open the whole mystery, as appears by another
memorandum. “When I precipitate lime by a common alkali there is no
effervescence: the air quits the alkali for the lime; but it is lime no
longer, but C. C. C.: it now effervesces, which good lime will not.”
What a multitude of important consequences naturally flowed from this
discovery! He now knew to what the causticity of alkalies is owing,
and how to induce it or remove it at pleasure. The common notion was
entirely reversed. Lime imparts nothing to the alkalies; it only
removes from them a peculiar kind of air (_carbonic acid gas_) with
which they were combined, and which prevented their natural caustic
properties from being developed. All the former mysteries disappear,
and the greatest simplicity appears in those operations of nature which
before appeared so intricate and obscure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account