The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
When copper is exposed to ignition, you may discern a sulphureous flame
to arise from it, which is a sign of sulphur not fixed; and the loss
of the quantity of it by exhalation through the frequent combustion
of it, shows that it has fixed sulphur. This last being in abundance,
occasions the slowness of its fusion and the hardness of its substance.
That copper contains red and unclean sulphur, united to unclean
mercury, is, he thinks, evident, from its sensible qualities.[113]
[113] Ibid.
Tin consists of sulphur of small fixation, white with a whiteness not
pure, not overcoming but overcome, mixed with mercury partly fixed and
partly not fixed, white and impure.[114] That this is the constitution
of tin he thinks evident; for when calcined, it emits a sulphureous
stench, which is a sign of sulphur not fixed: it yields no flame, not
because the sulphur is fixed, but because it contains a great portion
of mercury. In tin there is a twofold sulphur and also a twofold
mercury. One sulphur is less fixed, because in calcining it gives out
a stench as sulphur. The fixed sulphur continues in the tin after it
is calcined. He thinks that the twofold mercury in tin is evident, from
this, that before calcination it makes a crashing noise when bent, but
after it has been thrice calcined, that crashing noise can no longer
be perceived.[115] Geber says, that if lead be washed with mercury,
and after its washing melted in a fire not exceeding the fire of its
fusion, a portion of the mercury will remain combined with the lead,
and will give it the crashing noise and all the qualities of tin. On
the other hand, you may convert tin into lead. By manifold repetition
of its calcination, and the administration of fire convenient for its
reduction, it is turned into lead.[116]
[114] Ibid., chap. 9.
[115] Sum of Perfection, book ii. part i. chap. 9.
[116] Ibid.
Lead, in Geber’s opinion, differs from tin only in having a more
unclean substance commixed of the two more gross substances, sulphur
and mercury. The sulphur in it is burning and more adhesive to the
substance of its own mercury, and it has more of the substance of fixed
sulphur in its composition than tin has.[117]
[117] Ibid., chap. 10.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account