The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
Such are the opinions which Geber entertained respecting the
composition of the metals. I have been induced to state them as nearly
in his own words as possible, and to give the reasons which he has
assigned for them, even when his facts were not quite correct, because
I thought that this was the most likely way of conveying to the reader
an accurate notion of the sentiments of this father of the alchymists,
upon the very foundation of the whole doctrine of the transmutation
of metals. He was of opinion that all the imperfect metals might be
transformed into gold and silver, by altering the proportions of the
mercury and sulphur of which they are composed, and by changing the
nature of the mercury and sulphur so as to make them the same with the
mercury and sulphur which constitute gold and silver. The substance
capable of producing these important changes he calls sometimes the
_philosopher’s stone_, but generally the _medicine_. He gives the
method of preparing this important _magistery_, as he calls it. But it
is not worth while to state his process, because he leaves out several
particulars, in order to prevent the foolish from reaping any benefit
from his writings, while at the same time those readers who possess the
proper degree of sagacity will be able, by studying the different parts
of his writings, to divine the nature of the steps which he omits, and
thus profit by his researches and explanations. But it will be worth
while to notice the most important of his processes, because this will
enable us to judge of the state of chemistry in his time.
4. In his book on furnaces, he gives a description of a furnace proper
for calcining metals, and from the fourteenth chapter of the fourth
part of the first book of his Sum of Perfection, it is obvious that the
method of calcining or oxidizing iron, copper, tin, and lead, and also
mercury and arsenic were familiarly known to him.
He gives a description of a furnace for distilling, and a pretty minute
account of the glass or stoneware, or metallic aludel and alembic,
by means of which the process was conducted. He was in the habit of
distilling by surrounding his aludel with hot ashes, to prevent it
from being broken. He was acquainted also with the water-bath. These
processes were familiar to him. The description of the distillation of
many bodies occurs in his work; but there is not the least evidence
that he was acquainted with ardent spirits. The term _spirit_ occurs
frequently in his writings, but it was applied to volatile bodies in
general, and in particular to sulphur and white arsenic, which he
considered as substances very similar in their properties. Mercury also
he considered as a spirit.
The method of distilling _per descensum_, as is practised in the
smelting of zinc, was also known to him. He describes an apparatus for
the purpose, and gives several examples of such distillations in his
writings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account