The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
In the year 1804 he published the analysis of a red-coloured mineral,
from Bastnäs in Sweden, which had been at one time confounded with
tungsten; but which the Elhuyarts had shown to contain none of that
metal. Klaproth showed that it contained a new substance, as one of
its constituents, which he considered as a new earth, and which he
called _ochroita_, because it forms coloured salts with acids. Two
years after, another analysis of the same mineral was published by
Berzelius and Hisinger. They considered the new substance which the
mineral contained as a metallic oxide, and to the unknown metallic base
they gave the name of _cerium_, which has been adopted by chemists
in preference to Klaproth's name. The characters of oxide of cerium
given by Berzelius and Hisinger, agree with those given by Klaproth
to ochroita, in all the essential circumstances. Of course Klaproth
must be considered as the discoverer of this new body. The distinction
between _earth_ and _metallic oxide_ is now known to be an imaginary
one. All the substances formerly called earths are, in fact, metallic
oxides.
Besides these new substances, which he detected by his own labours,
he repeated the analyses of others, and confirmed and extended the
discoveries they had made. Thus, when Vauquelin discovered the new
earth _glucina_, in the emerald and beryl, he repeated the analysis
of these minerals, confirmed the discovery of Vauquelin, and gave a
detailed account of the characters and properties of glucina. Gadolin
had discovered another new earth in the mineral called gadolinite. This
discovery was confirmed by the analysis of Ekeberg, who distinguished
the new earth by the name of yttria. Klaproth immediately repeated
the analysis of the gadolinite, confirmed the results of Ekeberg's
analysis, and examined and described the properties of _yttria_.
When Dr. Kennedy discovered soda in basalt, Klaproth repeated the
analysis of this mineral, and confirmed the results obtained by the
Edinburgh analyst.
But it would occupy too much room, if I were to enumerate every example
of such conduct. Whoever will take the trouble to examine the different
volumes of the Beitrage, will find several others not less striking or
less useful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account