The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
The next paper of M. Lavoisier, which appeared in the Memoirs of the
Academy, for 1782 (published in 1785), shows how well he appreciated
the importance of the discovery of the composition of water. It is
entitled, "General Considerations on the Solution of the Metals in
Acids." He shows that when metals are dissolved in acids, they are
converted into oxides, and that the acid does not combine with the
metal, but only with its oxide. When nitric acid is the solvent the
oxidizement takes place at the expense of the acid, which is resolved
into nitrous gas and oxygen. The nitrous gas makes its escape, and may
be collected; but the oxygen unites with the metal and renders it an
oxide. He shows this with respect to the solution of mercury in nitric
acid. He collected the nitrous gas given out during the solution of
the metal in the acid: then evaporated the solution to dryness, and
urged the fire till the mercury was converted into red oxide. The fire
being still further urged, the red oxide was reduced, and the oxygen
gas given off was collected and measured. He showed that the nitrous
gas and the oxygen gas thus obtained, added together, formed just the
quantity of nitric acid which had disappeared during the process. A
similar experiment was made by dissolving iron in nitric acid, and then
urging the fire till the iron was freed from every foreign body, and
obtained in the state of black oxide.
It is well known that many metals held in solution by acids may be
precipitated in the metallic state, by inserting into the solution
a plate of some other metal. A portion of that new metal dissolves,
and takes the place of the metal originally in solution. Suppose, for
example, that we have a neutral solution of copper in sulphuric acid,
if we put into the solution a plate of iron, the copper is thrown down
in the metallic state, while a certain portion of the iron enters into
the solution, combining with the acid instead of the copper. But the
copper, while in solution, was in the state of an oxide, and it is
precipitated in the metallic state. The iron was in the metallic state;
but it enters into the solution in the state of an oxide. It is clear
from this that the oxygen, during these precipitations, shifts its
place, leaving the copper, and entering into combination with the iron.
If, therefore, in such a case we determine the exact quantity of copper
thrown down, and the exact quantity of iron dissolved at the same time,
it is clear that we shall have the relative weight of each combined
with the same weight of oxygen. If, for example, 4 of copper be thrown
down by the solution of 3·5 of iron; then it is clear that 3·5 of iron
requires just as much oxygen as 4 of copper, to turn both into the
oxide that exists in the solution, which is the black oxide of each.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account