The History of ChivalryJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
History
The History of Chivalry
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Chivalry; Crusades
The distinctive spirit also had by this time greatly merged into other
feelings. The valour was as much the quality of the simple soldier as of
the knight; the courtesy had spread to society in general, and had become
politeness; the gallantry had lost its refinement, and had deteriorated
into debauchery. Faint traces of the lost institution appeared from time
to time, especially in the wars of Henry IV. and the League. The artful
and vicious policy of Catherine de Medicis did much to destroy it; the
filthy effeminacy of Henry III. weakened it, in common with all noble
feelings; and the iron rod of Richelieu struck at it as a remnant of the
feudal power. Still a bright blaze of its daring valour shone out in
Condé, a touch of its noble simplicity appeared in Turenne, but the false
brilliancy of Louis XIV. completed its downfall; and Chivalry is only to
be seen by its general effects on society.
Thus things fleet by us; and in reading of all the great and mighty deeds
of which this book has given a slight and imperfect sketch, and looking on
the multitudes of men who have toiled and struggled through dangers,
difficulties, and horrors for the word GLORY, the empty echo of renown, or
perhaps a worse reward, I rise as from a phantasmagoria where a world of
strange and glittering figures have been passing before my eyes, changing
with the rapidity of light, and each leaving an impression for memory,
though the whole was but the shadow of a shade.
NOTES.
NOTE I.--CHAP. I.
Menestrier enters into a disquisition on the subject of the two
interpretations given to the word _miles_, which would have interrupted
the thread of my discourse too much to permit of its introduction in the
text. I subjoin it here, however, as a good guide for those who may be
inclined to pursue the subject further.
"Il ne faut pas donc confondre le titre d'ancienne noblesse, ou de
noblesse militaire, avec la dignité de chevalier, par l'équivoque du terme
Latin _miles_, qui convient à l'un et à l'autre; ce que n'ont pas assez
observé quelques autheurs, qui n'ont pas fait reflexion que dans la
plûpart des actes écrits en langue Latine, ce mot signifie également ces
deux différentes choses.
* * * * *
"L'Empereur Frederic avoir déjà? distingué ces deux espèces de Chevalerie,
lors qu'il fit une ordonnance à Naples, l'an 1232, que personne ne se
presentât pour recevoir l'ordre de Chevalerie, s'il n'estoit d'une
ancienne race militaire, ou d'ancienne Chevalerie. _Ad militarem honorem
nullus accedat, qui non sit de genere militum_; L'une de ces Chevaleries
est donc _genus militare_, race de Chevalerie; l'autre _militaris honor_,
honneur de Chevalerie, qui n'ont esté confonduës que par quelques
autheurs, qui, écrivans de cette matière sans l'entendre, n'ont fait que
l'embroüiller, au lieu de la developper.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account