The History of ChivalryJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
History
The History of Chivalry
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Chivalry; Crusades
"Roger, Roy de Sicile et de Naples, fit une ordonnance, que nul ne pût
recevoir l'ordre de Chevalerie, s'il n'estoit de race militaire. _Sancimus
itaque, et tale proponimus edictum, ut quicumque novam militiam
acceperit_, il l'appelle nouvelle Chevalerie, pour la distinguer de celle
de la naissance, _sive quocumque tempore arripuerit, contra regni
beatitudinem, pacem, atque integritatem, à militiæ nomine, et professione
penitùs decidat, nisi fortè à militari genere per successionem duxit
prosapiam_."--Menestrier; Preuves, chap. 1.
NOTE II.--CHAP. II.
St. Palaye, in the body of his admirable essays upon Chivalry, names the
day preceding that of the tournament as the one on which squires were
permitted to joust with each other: but in a note he has the following
passage, which shows that in this, as in almost every other respect, the
customs of chivalry varied very much at different epochs.
"Les usages out varié par rapport aux tournois, suivant les divers temps
de la Chevalerie. Dans les commencements les plus anciens chevaliers
joutoient entre eux, et le lendemain de cette joute les nouveaux
chevaliers s'exerçoient dans d'autres tournois, auxquels les anciens
chevaliers se faisoient un plaisir d'assister en qualité de spectateurs.
La coutume changea depuis: ce fut la veille des grands tournois que les
jeunes chevaliers s'essayerent les uns contre les autres, et l'on permit
aux écuyers de se mêler avec eux. Ceux-ci étoient récompensés par l'ordre
de la Chevalerie, lorsqu'ils se distinguoient dans ces sortes de combats.
Ce mélange de chevaliers et d'écuyers introduisit dans la suite divers
abus dans la Chevalerie, et la fit bientôt dégénérer, comme le remarque M.
Le Laboureur. Les écuyers usurpèrent successivement et par degrés les
honneurs et les distinctions qui n'appartenoient qu'aux chevaliers, et
peu-à-peu ils se confondirent avec eux."--_Note on St. Palaye._
This note is perfectly just in the statement that in after-times the
distinctions between knights and squires were not so strictly maintained
as in the early days of Chivalry. At the famous jousts between the French
and English at Chateau Joscelin, as related by Froissart, we find the
squires opposed to the knights upon perfectly equal terms. The limits of
this book are too narrow to admit of many long quotations; but the passage
will be found well worthy the trouble of seeking, in the sixty fourth
chapter of the second book of the admirable Froissart.
NOTE III.--CHAP. II.
To show the manner in which reports of all kinds were spread and collected
even as late as the days of Edward III., I have subjoined the following
extract from Froissart, giving an account of his reception at the court of
the Count de Foix. It also affords a _naive_ picture of that curious
simplicity of manners which formed one very singular and interesting trait
in the Chivalry of old.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account