The History of Creation, Vol. 1 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural CausesHaeckel, Ernst
Philosophy
The History of Creation, Vol. 1 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes
Haeckel, Ernst
Evolution; Heredity; Human beings -- Origin
NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF THE DOCTRINE OF FILIATION,
OR DESCENT-THEORY.
PAGE
General Importance and Essential Nature of the Theory of
Descent as reformed by Darwin.—Its Special Importance to
Biology (Zoology and Botany).—Its Special Importance to
the History of the Natural Development of the Human
Race.—The Theory of Descent as the Non-Miraculous History
of Creation.—Idea of Creation.—Knowledge and
Belief.—History of Creation and History of
Development.—The Connection between the History of
Individual and Palæontological Development.—The Theory of
Purposelessness, or the Science of Rudimentary
Organs.—Useless and Superfluous Arrangements in
Organisms.—Contrast between the two entirely Opposed
Views of Nature: the Monistic (mechanical, causal) and the
Dualistic (teleological, vital).—Proof of the former by
the Theory of Descent.—Unity of Organic and Inorganic
Nature, and the Identity of the Active Causes in
both.—The Importance of the Theory of Descent to the
Monistic Conception of all Nature 1
CHAPTER II.
SCIENTIFIC JUSTIFICATION OF THE THEORY OF DESCENT.
HISTORY OF CREATION ACCORDING TO LINNÆUS.
The Theory of Descent, or Doctrine of Filiation, as the
Monistic Explanation of Organic Natural Phenomena.—Its
Comparison with Newton’s Theory of Gravitation.—Limits of
Scientific Explanation and of Human Knowledge in
general.—All Knowledge founded originally on Sensuous
Experience, _à posteriori_.—Transition of _à posteriori_
knowledge, by inheritance, into _à priori_
knowledge.—Contrast between the Supernatural Hypotheses
of the Creation according to Linnæus, Cuvier, Agassiz,
and the Natural Theories of Development according to
Lamarck, Goethe, and Darwin.—Connection of the former
with the Monistic (mechanical), of the latter with the
Dualistic Conception of the Universe.—Monism and
Materialism.—Scientific and Moral Materialism.—The
History of Creation according to Moses.—Linnæus as the
Founder of the Systematic Description of Nature and
Distinction of Species.—Linnæus’ Classification and
Binary Nomenclature.—Meaning of Linnæus’ Idea of
Species.—His History of Creation.—Linnæus’ view of the
Origin of Species 24
CHAPTER III.
THE HISTORY OF CREATION ACCORDING TO CUVIER
AND AGASSIZ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account