The History of Creation, Vol. 1 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural CausesHaeckel, Ernst
Philosophy
The History of Creation, Vol. 1 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes
Haeckel, Ernst
Evolution; Heredity; Human beings -- Origin
These two extremely fruitful thoughts of Oken, on account of the absurd
form in which he expressed them, were at first little heeded, or
entirely misunderstood, and it was reserved for a much later era to
establish them by actual observation. The supposition that the
individual species of plants and animals originated from common
prototypes by a slow and gradual development of the higher organisms out
of lower ones, was of course most closely connected with these ideas.
Man’s descent from lower organisms was likewise asserted by Oken—“Man
has been developed, not created.” Although many arbitrary perversities
and extravagant fancies may be found in Oken’s philosophy of nature,
they must not prevent us paying our just admiration to these grand
ideas, which were so far in advance of their age. This much is clearly
evident from the statements of Goethe and Oken which we have quoted, and
from the views of Lamarck and Geoffroy which have to be discussed next,
that during the first decade of our century no doctrine approached so
nearly to the natural Theory of Descent, newly established by Darwin, as
the much decried “Natur-philosophie.”
CHAPTER V.
THEORY OF DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO KANT AND LAMARCK.
Kant’s Dualistic Biology.—His Conception of the Origin
of Inorganic Nature by Mechanical Causes, of Organic
Nature by Causes acting for a Definite
Purpose.—Contradiction of this Conception with his
leaning towards the Theory of Descent.—Kant’s
Genealogical Theory of Development.—Its Limitation by
his Teleology.—Comparison of Genealogical Biology with
Comparative Philology.—Views in favour of the Theory of
Descent entertained by Leopold Buch, Bär, Schleiden,
Unger, Schaafhausen, Victor Carus, Büchner.—French
Nature-philosophy.—Lamarck’s Philosophie
Zoologique.—Lamarck’s Monistic (mechanical) System of
Nature.—His Views of the Interaction of the Two Organic
Formative Tendencies of Inheritance and
Adaptation.—Lamarck’s Conception of Man’s Development
from Ape-like Mammals.—Geoffroy St. Hilaire’s, Naudin’s,
and Lecoq’s Defence of the Theory of Descent.—English
Nature-philosophy.—Views in favour of the Theory of
Descent, entertained by Erasmus Darwin, W. Herbert,
Grant, Freke, Herbert Spencer, Hooker, Huxley.—The
Double Merit of Charles Darwin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account