The History of Creation, Vol. 2 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural CausesHaeckel, Ernst
Science
The History of Creation, Vol. 2 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes
Haeckel, Ernst
Evolution; Heredity; Human beings -- Origin
Special Mode of Carrying out the Theory of Descent in the
Natural System of Organisms.—Construction of Pedigrees.—Descent
of all Many-Celled from Single-Celled Organisms.—Descent of
Cells from Monera.—Meaning of Organic Tribes, or Phyla.—Number
of the Tribes in the Animal and Vegetable Kingdoms.—The
Monophyletic Hypothesis of Descent, or the Hypothesis of one
Common Progenitor, and the Polyphyletic Hypothesis of Descent,
or the Hypothesis of Many Progenitors.—The Kingdom of Protista,
or Primæval Beings.—Eight Classes of the Protista
Kingdom.—Monera, Amœbæ, or Protoplastæ.—Whip-swimmers, or
Flagellata.—Ciliated-balls, or Catallacta.—Labyrinth-streamers,
or Labyrinthuleæ.—Flint-cells, or Diatomeæ.—Mucous-moulds, or
Myxomycetes.—Root-footers (Rhizopoda).—Remarks on the General
Natural History of the Protista: Their Vital Phenomena,
Chemical Composition, and Formation (Individuality and
Fundamental Form).—Phylogeny of the Protista Kingdom
By a careful comparison of the individual and the palæontological
development, as also by the comparative anatomy of organisms, by the
comparative examination of their fully developed structural
characteristics, we arrive at the knowledge of the degrees of their
different structural relationships. By this, however, we at the same
time obtain an insight into their true _blood relationship_, which,
according to the Theory of Descent, is the real reason of the structural
relationship. Hence by collecting, comparing, and employing the
empirical results of embryology, palæontology, and anatomy for
supplementing each other, we arrive at an approximate knowledge of “the
Natural System,” which, according to our views, is the _pedigree_ of
organisms. It is true that our human knowledge, in all things
fragmentary, is especially so in this case, on account of the extreme
incompleteness and defectiveness of the records of creation. However, we
must not allow this to discourage us, or to deter us from undertaking
this highest problem of biology. Let us rather see how far it may even
now be possible, in spite of the imperfect state of our embryological,
palæontological, and anatomical knowledge, to establish a probable
scheme of the genealogical relationships of organisms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account