The History of Cuba, vol. 3Johnson, Willis Fletcher
History
The History of Cuba, vol. 3
Johnson, Willis Fletcher
Cuba -- Economic conditions; Cuba -- History
For some strange reason, Mr. Fish seemed to have lost his usual cool
wisdom; for he went perilously near to ignoring the Monroe Doctrine, so
sacred to all the traditions of American diplomacy, when he directed
that a copy of this letter be forwarded to General Robert C. Schenck,
the United States Minister at London, directing him to ask for the
support of Great Britain in his position.
Following this action of his Secretary of State, President Grant, in his
message to Congress in December, 1875, said: "The past year has
furnished no evidence of an approaching termination of the ruinous
conflict which has been raging for seven years in the neighboring island
of Cuba. While conscious that the insurrection has shown a strength and
endurance which made it at least doubtful whether it be in the power of
Spain to subdue it, it seems unquestionable that no such civil
organization exists which may be recognized as an independent government
capable of performing its international obligations and entitled to be
treated as one of the powers of the earth."
The Spanish government was very wrathful when these facts became known
to it and at once sent a note to Great Britain claiming that the United
States had no reason to bewail the Cuban situation, for on account of it
her commerce had increased; that Spanish had had under the most jealous
and watchful care, as regards the safety of their person and property,
all American citizens who were engaged in business ventures on the
island, and that most of them were making huge fortunes. A complaint was
made that the United States gave refuge to Cuban outlaws, and it was
alleged that all past claims of the United States growing out of the
Cuban difficulty had been or were about to be settled.
However, Great Britain refused to have anything to do with an attempt,
in conjunction with the United States, to end the Cuban war, stating
that it was doubtful whether Spain would accept any terms that could be
offered, and that if she refused, Great Britain did not feel willing to
bring pressure to bear.
Spain, in a note dated February 3, 1876, intimated that the reason why a
settlement of the insurrection in Cuba had not been effected was because
the insurgents would not come out into the open and fight, but preferred
to wage a guerrilla warfare from mountain fastnesses; that could they be
lured into the open, Spain had a sufficient force in the field promptly
to defeat them. It was further intimated that the Creoles were tiring of
the insurrection and that it was now being supported mainly by negroes,
mulattoes, Chinese laborers, adventurers, and deserters from the Spanish
army. Finally the assertion was made that when Spain was finally
victorious, as it was assumed that she would be, she would at once
abolish slavery, and put into effect the most liberal of administrative
reforms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account