The History of Currency, 1252 to 1896 — John Shaqi
The History of Currency, 1252 to 1896Shaw, William Arthur
History
The History of Currency, 1252 to 1896
Shaw, William Arthur
Money -- History
3. With regard to the figures of the ratios there is great difference
and divergence among the various authorities. The declared ratio may be
of a double nature--(1) mercantile, as calculated on the purchase price
of gold and silver in the open market; (2) legal, as settled by law in
the terms prescribed for Mint purchase and issue. The former is
comparatively simple, but it is not until a quite recent date, the
opening of the eighteenth century, that it is statistically
determinable. The table of the commercial ratio (pp. 157-9 infra.) is
taken from Soetbeer, and was by him calculated on the Hamburg exchange
and London market rates. The competing figures of the commercial ratio
drawn up by Ingham in his Report to the Senate of the United States (4th
May 1830), and by John White, of the same date (see _United States
Report of the International Monetary Conference of 1878_, pp. 583, 647),
I regard as comparatively untrustworthy.
With regard to the legal or Mint ratio (see infra., tables, pp. 40,
69-70, 157) there is the greatest discrepancy, and I print the figures
with much trepidation and every mental reserve. The differences in the
results arrived at by the various authorities are due to the difference
in method of calculation, according as the issue price or the purchase
price at the Mint is taken (i.e. with or without allowance of
seigniorage and remedy), or according as the pure or gross content of
the piece is calculated from (i.e. with or without allowance for alloy).
As a matter of fact, hardly any two authorities or sets of calculations
agree. See, for instance, duplicate sets of figures for Holland in
Appendix 1. to Schimmel's _Geschiedkundig overzicht_; or again, compare
Soetbeer's figures with those deduced by Köhler in his _Grundliche
Nachricht_; or by Dr. Arnold Luschin, in the _Proceedings of the Congrés
International de Numismatique_, 1880, p. 443; or with those deducible
from Le Blanc's tables (infra., Appendix VI.). It is to this difference
that must be attributed the discrepancy in the statement of the ratio
by the French Mint authorities in 1640 (see text, infra., p. 92 and
note, ibid.). The difficulty of calculating the European Mint ratio at
any moment can be judged from the experience and statements of persons
so widely apart as Sir Isaac Newton in England, Mirabeau and Calonne in
France, and Morris and Hamilton in the United States (see infra., pp.
172-3, 229-30, and 251).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account