The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
speak; ’tis now of no use to talk; you have nothing now for it but
firing.’ The signal was immediately given: we fired, and I fell.” The
deceased expressed himself satisfied with Mr. Christie’s conduct; whom
he described as having been very kind to him after he was wounded.
Mr. Pettigrew stated, that Mr. Christie asked him what he thought of the
wound. He replied, that he feared it was mortal, in the hearing of Mr.
Scott; when Mr. Christie addressed Mr. Scott, and expressed a wish “that
he had been in Mr. Scott’s situation, rather than Mr. Scott should have
been wounded by him.” Mr. Scott then said, “Whatever may be the issue of
this business, I beg you will bear in remembrance, that everything has
been fair and honourable.” On being asked, if he did not hear it said on
the ground, by Mr. Christie, that he had fired down the field, he
replied—“I did; to the best of my recollection, Mr. Christie said,
wringing his hands, apparently in agony, ‘Why was I permitted to fire a
second time? I discharged my pistol down the field before; I could do no
more. I was compelled to fire in my own defence.’” These expressions
were made in consequence of some altercation which took place between
the seconds. Mr. Christie took Mr. Scott by the hand after he was
wounded.—The Coroner having summed up the evidence, the jury returned a
verdict of “wilful murder” against Mr. Christie, Mr. Trail, and Mr.
Patmore.
On Friday, the 13th of April, Chief Justice Abbott and Mr. Justice Park
having taken their seats on the bench, at the Old Bailey, Mr. Gurney,
who was their counsel, announced that Mr. Christie and Mr. Trail
attended to surrender and take their trials, upon an indictment found by
the grand jury against them for murder. They were immediately placed at
the bar, and pleaded “Not guilty.” Mr. Patmore did not make his
appearance. The case for the prosecution was opened by Mr. Walford; who
observed, that if the jury felt any doubts as to the identity of the
prisoners, or thought the whole affair was gone through in heat, then
they would acquit the gentlemen at the bar. Dr. Darling then repeated
the evidence he had given before the coroner. After which, Mr. Christie
and Mr. Trail being called on for their defence, stated, that they
should only call witnesses to speak to their general character and
habits of life. A number of most respectable persons then bore testimony
to the general benevolence and humanity of their dispositions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account