The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
inconvenient, and they would have moved her to another, but I would not
suffer it, because it had no room backwards, and she must have been
tortured with the noise of the Grub-street screamers dinging her
husband’s murder in her ears.”
This duel must have been of the most murderous nature, from the number
of wounds that both parties received. The Duke of Hamilton had received
one on the right side of the leg, about seven inches long, another in
the right arm, the third in the upper part of the right breast, running
downwards towards the body, the fourth on the outside of the left leg.
Lord Mohun received a large wound in the groin, another in the right
side through the body and up to the hilt of the sword, and a third in
his arm.
In the Postboy, of the 20th November, the following particulars of this
field meeting were given:—“Major-General M’Carthy went three times to
the Duke, and was at the bagnio all night with Lord Mohun, who was
observed to be seized with fear and trembling at the time. The seconds
were Colonel Hamilton, of the Foot-guards, for the Duke, and M’Carthy
for Lord Mohun. It appears that the parties did not parry, but gave
thrusts at each other, and Lord Mohun shortening his sword stabbed the
Duke in the upper part of the left breast running downwards into the
body, which wound was fourteen inches long, and he expired soon after he
was put into the coach. A dispute at law had existed between the
parties, but without any personal quarrel of consequence.”
Swift, in his history of the four last years of Queen Anne, says, that
M’Carthy stabbed the Duke after he was wounded by Lord Mohun. He
afterwards escaped to Holland, but in June, 1716, was tried for murder
in the Court of King’s Bench, and found guilty of manslaughter. Swift
relates a curious anecdote of a gentleman, who being attacked by
highwaymen, told them that he was M’Carthy, upon which they brought him
before a justice in the hopes of receiving the reward for his
apprehension, when he gave the rogues in charge.
This Lord Mohun appears to have been an unprincipled character, whose
associates were in general as depraved and contemptible as himself. In
the year 1692, we find him tried for the murder of Montford the player,
an atrocious act, in which he was at any rate most deeply implicated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account