The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
Notwithstanding this evidence, Lord Mohun was acquitted of the charge of
having been accessory to the murder. The only circumstance in his favour
was the question whether Hall had stabbed Montford when unprepared, or
whether the unfortunate man had defended himself. It was proved that his
sword had been broken. Howbeit, little doubt could exist as to the
culpability of Lord Mohun, in having coolly and deliberately planned the
act of violence against Mrs. Bracegirdle, with a determination to rid
themselves of her supposed paramour _any how_; and we cannot but marvel
at his peers allowing him to escape unpunished. It was the baseness and
profligacy of this man that confirmed the general belief that the Duke
of Hamilton had been foully murdered by M’Carthy, Mohun’s second and
friend, no doubt as worthy as his former companion Hall.
William Montford was an actor of considerable merit, and was also a
successful dramatic writer. He was only thirty-three years of age when
he met with this untimely end. Cibber speaks of him in the following
terms:—“He was tall in person, well made, fair, and of an agreeable
aspect. His voice full, clear, and melodious. In tragedy, he was the
most affecting lover within my memory. His addresses had a resistless
recommendation, from the very tone of his voice, which gave his words
such softness that, as Dryden says,
Like flocks of feather’d snow,
They melted as they fell!
It was to be expected, that such worthless ruffians as Mohun and Hall
should have been anxious to remove the rivalry of a person so likely to
please Mrs. Bracegirdle, although the intimacy between her and Montford
was such, as to leave those acquainted with the parties firmly convinced
that no improper intercourse existed between them. From her walk in the
drama, they constantly performed together, and a strict intimacy had not
only arisen between them, but between Mrs. Bracegirdle and Mrs.
Montford.
In 1662 a meeting took place between Mr. Jermyn, nephew to the Earl of
St. Alban’s, and afterwards himself Lord Jermyn, and Colonel Giles
Rawlins on the one side; and Captain Thomas Howard, brother to Lord
Carlisle, and a friend on the other. Mr. Jermyn was severely wounded,
and his second killed. They fought in the old Pall Mall, St. James’s.
Mr. Jermyn, the challenged party, was entirely ignorant of the nature of
the offence he had given, nor could he induce his antagonist to inform
him. Captain Howard was supposed to have worn a coat of mail under his
dress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account