The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
Buckingham’s marriage was an act of reparation of his profligacy. He had
seduced the only daughter of the Earl of Rutland, and carried her to his
lodgings at Whitehall. After having kept her there for some time he
returned her to her father, who intimated to the royal favourite, “that
he had too much of the gentleman to suffer such an indignity, and if he
did not marry his daughter immediately, to restore her honour, no power
should protect him from his just revenge.” She was heiress to a
considerable fortune, and Buckingham complied with the Earl’s
injunction.
In 1661, a quarrel arose in London between several ambassadors, which
proved likely to lead to serious consequences. Philip IV. of Spain had
sent the Baron de Batteville to London, where the Comte d’Estrade was
ambassador for France. The Comte de Brabe, the Swedish ambassador, had
made his first entry in town, when a dispute arose amongst these
ministers regarding precedence, each being anxious to take the lead of
the other. The Baron de Batteville had cut the traces of the carriage of
the French ambassador, and when the domestics of the latter sought to
retaliate, they found that chains had been used instead of ordinary
traces. The King of France recalled his minister, and the Spanish
monarch sent the Comte de Fuentes to Paris to apologize for the conduct
of his ambassador. A duel had been expected, as the Comte d’Estrade had
been engaged in the hostile meeting between the Duc de Guise and the
Comte de Coligny, and was considered a very punctilious person in such
matters; but the parties very wisely had referred the affair to their
respective courts.
At this period the pit of the theatre became the constant _arena_ of
quarrels that led to duels. The young bloods of the day made it a point
to go to the playhouse, for the mere purpose of insulting females, and
getting themselves involved in disputes that might increase their
fashionable popularity. In 1720, Mrs. Oldfield, a celebrated actress,
was performing in “The Scornful Lady,” when Beau Fielding (the Orlando
the Fair of the Tatler) insulted a barrister of the name of Fulwood, by
pushing rudely against him. Fulwood expostulated with some degree of
violence, upon which Fielding laid his hand upon his sword. The
pugnacious lawyer drew, and gave his antagonist a severe wound in the
body. Beau Fielding, who was then a man of above fifty years of age,
came forward, and uncovering his breast, showed his bleeding wound to
the public, to excite the compassion of the fair sex; but, to his no
small disappointment, a burst of laughter broke forth from the audience.
Fulwood, emboldened by his success with Fielding, repaired to
Lincoln’s-inn-fields Theatre, where he picked up another quarrel with a
Captain Cusack, and then demanded satisfaction. They went into the
fields, and the lawyer was professionally despatched by the soldier, and
left dead on the ground.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account