The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
Clubs were formed of those desperadoes, who assumed the name of the
“_Bold Bucks_,” and the “_Hell-fires_.” “_Blind and Bold Love_” was the
motto of the former association, the members of which, according to a
contemporary writer, “attempt females of their own species
promiscuously. Their own sisters fear their violence, and fly their
privacies.” Atheism was an indispensable qualification for admission
into their society, and their favourite dish for supper, at the taverns
they haunted, was called “_A Holy Ghost Pie_;” but their chief house of
_rendezvous_ was a tavern near Somerset House, where they usually
assembled during Divine service with a loud band of music.
Their excesses became so notorious, and proved such a public grievance,
that in 1721, a Royal proclamation was issued to suppress those clubs,
and about the same time a check was put to duelling by the sentence of
death passed on a Major Oneby, who thought it advisable to baulk the
executioner and the public curiosity by committing suicide.
The following are the particulars of this very important case:—Major
Oneby was indicted in the year 1726, for the murder of Mr. Gower, and a
special verdict was found, stating that the prisoner being in company
with the deceased, and three other persons, at a tavern, in a friendly
manner, after some time began playing at hazard; when _Rich_, one of the
company, asked if any one would set him three half crowns; whereupon the
deceased, in a jocular manner, laid down three halfpence, telling Rich
he had set him three pieces, and the prisoner at the same time set Rich
three half crowns, and lost them to him. Immediately after which, the
prisoner, in an angry manner, turned about to the deceased and said, “It
was an impertinent thing to set down halfpence, and that he was an
impertinent puppy for so doing;” to which the deceased answered,
“whoever called him so was a rascal.” Thereupon the prisoner took up a
bottle, and with great force threw it at the deceased’s head, but did
not hit him, the bottle only brushing some of the powder out of his
hair. The deceased, in return, immediately tossed a candlestick or
bottle at the prisoner, which missed him; upon which they both rose up
to fetch their swords, which were then hung up in the room, and the
deceased drew his sword, but the prisoner was prevented drawing his by
the company; the deceased thereupon threw away his sword, and the
company interposing, they sat down again for the space of an hour.
At the expiration of that time, the deceased said to the prisoner, “We
have had hot words, and you were the aggressor, but I think we may pass
it over,” at the same time offering his hand to the prisoner, who made
for answer, “No, d—n you, _I will have your blood_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account