The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
silly dog too.’ ‘I suppose, Mr. Leveson, you have been looking in the
glass.’ ‘No, I see him now.’ Upon which they walked off together, but
were prevented from fighting (if Nugent would have fought), and were
reconciled at the sideboard. The former circumstance gave rise to a
vulgar, but for a time, a fashionable saw, ‘We spit in his hat on
Thursday, and wipe it off on Friday.’”
Walpole calls Lord Hervey “The fair conqueror,” from his great
effeminacy, which induced Lord Cobham, better known as Earl Temple, to
insult him in so gross a manner.
As the fashion of wearing swords gradually fell into desuetude, pistols
were brought into play, and the fatal duel between Lord Byron and Mr.
Chaworth was one of the last that took place with side-arms.
DUEL OF LORD BYRON AND MR. CHAWORTH, 1765.
On the 26th of January, 1765, Lord Byron and several other gentlemen
dined together at the Star and Garter Tavern in Pall-mall. The party
were chiefly from the county of Nottingham, assembled in a club, about
seven in the evening. The conversation turned upon the subject of game;
upon this occasion Mr. Chaworth had a warm argument with a gentleman
seated next to him about the best manner of preserving game. Lord Byron
joined the conversation, and gave as his opinion, that the best method
was to take no care of it. Mr. Chaworth differed in opinion, and thought
it more advisable to be strict with poachers. This drew on an
altercation. Mr. Chaworth asserted that there was not a hare in that
part of the county which was not preserved by him, or by Sir Charles
Sedley. Upon which Lord Byron offered a bet of 100_l._ that he had more
game on a manor or manors of his, than Mr. Chaworth had on any belonging
to him. Mr. Chaworth accepted the wager, and made a memorandum of it.
Lord Byron then observed, with some degree of warmth, and in a sarcastic
manner, “Sir Charles Sedley’s manors! where are his manors!” To which
Mr. Chaworth replied, with equal heat, “The manors of Hucknel and
Nuttall.” To which Lord Byron replied, “I know no manors of Sir Charles
Sedley.” Mr. Chaworth then observed that the manor of Nuttall was his,
and that he had purchased it from his (Chaworth’s) family, and added,
“If your Lordship wants any further information about his manors, Sir
Charles Sedley lives in Dean-street, and your Lordship knows where to
find me in Berkley-square.”
After this altercation the party remained together for about an hour in
apparent good humour, and the conversation turned on various subjects.
About eight o’clock Mr. Chaworth left the room, and asked a gentleman of
the name of Douston, who was quitting it at the same time, whether he
had observed the dispute between him and Lord Byron. This person
replied, that he had heard part of it. On which Chaworth asked him if he
thought he had gone far enough; to which Mr. D. replied that he thought
he had gone too far, that it was altogether a silly business, and
neither of them should think any more about it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account