The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
This unfortunate duel leads to many important reflections. It appears
that the parties were sober, that no previous ill-will existed between
them; but that the vanity of both had been hurt by reflections on their
manorial possessions; and the subject of game has ever been, and still
continues to be, a sore one amongst country gentlemen. To fight without
seconds has at all times been considered a murderous transaction; since
no evidence can be produced to prove that the foulest treachery may not
have been perpetrated. Chaworth declined (most probably from a high
sense of honour) accusing his antagonist of foul play; but he at the
same time, on his death-bed, also declined admitting that there had been
fair play. Lord Byron stated, that having parried Mr. Chaworth’s first
thrust, he made a second, which he also parried; and that then finding
himself with his back against the table, with great disadvantage of
light, he endeavoured to shift a little more to the right hand, which
unavoidably brought him nearer to his antagonist, when they both made a
thrust at the same time, Mr. C.’s sword passing against his ribs, and
cutting his waistcoat and shirt for upwards of eight inches, and he
supposes that it was then that Mr. C. received the unlucky wound.
It is impossible to form an opinion on this event, as to the fairness of
the duel; it only tends to show, that any fatal meeting without seconds,
should be visited with such severity as to prevent the probability of a
recurrence.
In 1762, was fought the celebrated duel between Earl Talbot and John
Wilkes. The dispute had originated in words used in the 12th number of
the North Briton, on the 21st August, which conveyed reflections
injurious to Earl Talbot, when Wilkes wrote the following letter to
Colonel Berkeley (afterwards Lord Bottetourt):—
“Winchester, Sept. 30, 1762.
“SIR,
“Lord Talbot, by your message, has at last brought this most important
question to the precise point where my first answer to his Lordship
fixed it, if he preferred that. As you have only seen the two last
letters, I must entreat you to cast your eye over those preceding;
because I apprehend they will justify an observation or two I made this
morning, when I had the honour of paying my respects to you at camp. Be
assured, that if I am between heaven and earth, I will be on Tuesday
evening at Telbury’s, the Red Lion, at Bagshot, and on Wednesday morning
will play this duel with his Lordship.
“It is a real satisfaction to me that his Lordship is to be accompanied
by a gentleman of Colonel Berkeley’s worth and honour.
“This will be delivered to you by my Adjutant, who attends me at
Bagshot. I shall not bring any servant with me, from the fear of any of
the parties being known. My pistols only, or his Lordship’s, at his
option, shall decide this point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account