The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
That such might have been his private character is most decidedly to be
hoped; but most unquestionably, his public character rendered him a
nuisance to society, and whoever did rid the world of such a murderous
and (in matters of blood) unprincipled ruffian, was entitled to public
thanks. Priding himself on his superiority in pistol practice, he sought
for quarrels on every possible occasion. His dress, more especially in
uniform, was such as to excite remark and observation, which he would
gladly seize upon to fight a duel. He was even known to treat his horses
in the streets of London in the most cruel manner, for the mere purpose
of drawing forth some remonstrance or remark which he could consider an
insult, and justify a murder. He died as he had lived, a blood-thirsty
monster. He sought to deprive a bosom friend of life, although he was
conscious of the falsehood of his own assertions, solely because he
wished to display his superiority as a shot, and endeavoured to
sacrifice a companion whom he esteemed, for a miserable woman whom he
despised. His previous conduct towards Paterson was not justifiable
under any circumstances of discipline, since he had the means of
bringing him to condign punishment without being his executioner.
He was attended in the course of the day by Mr. Heaviside, Mr. Thomson,
and Mr. Horne, surgeons. A Mr. Nihell, or Nield, we understand, was
second to Captain Best, and the Hon. Mr. Devereux was second to Lord
Camelford.
The following is a further account of his death, as it appeared in one
of the papers of the day:—
March 12.
On Saturday evening this unfortunate nobleman breathed his last. He sent
for his solicitor, Mr. Wilson, of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, and made his
will the night after the accident; and maintained the most perfect
composure under his sufferings to the last.
In the voluminous evidence adduced before the coroner’s inquest, it was
proved, that Lord Camelford had declared,—that he was the aggressor,
that he forgave the gentleman who had shot him, and that he hoped God
would forgive him too.
Mr. Hodgson, the coroner, in his address to the jury, made the following
observations:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account