The History of England, from the Accession of James II — Volume 2Macaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
History
The History of England, from the Accession of James II — Volume 2
Macaulay, Thomas Babington Macaulay, Baron
Great Britain -- History -- James II, 1685-1688; Great Britain -- History -- William and Mary, 1689-1702
And here, if James had not been infatuated, the matter might have
stopped. The Fellows in general were not inclined to carry their
resistance further. They were of opinion that, by refusing to assist
in the admission of the intruder, they had sufficiently proved their
respect for their statutes and oaths, and that, since he was now in
actual possession, they might justifiably submit to him as their head,
till he should be removed by sentence of a competent court. Only one
Fellow, Doctor Fairfax, refused to yield even to this extent. The
Commissioners would gladly have compromised the dispute on these terms;
and during a few hours there was a truce which many thought likely to
end in an amicable arrangement: but soon all was again in confusion.
The Fellows found that the popular voice loudly accused them of
pusillanimity. The townsmen already talked ironically of a Magdalene
conscience, and exclaimed that the brave Hough and the honest Fairfax
had been betrayed and abandoned. Still more annoying were the sneers
of Obadiah Walker and his brother renegades. This then, said those
apostates, was the end of all the big words in which the society had
declared itself resolved to stand by its lawful President and by its
Protestant faith. While the Fellows, bitterly annoyed by the public
censure, were regretting the modified submission which they had
consented to make, they learned that this submission was by no means
satisfactory to the King. It was not enough, he said, that they offered
to obey the Bishop of Oxford as President in fact. They must distinctly
admit the Commission and all that had been done under it to be legal.
They must acknowledge that they had acted undutifully; they must declare
themselves penitent; they must promise to behave better in future,
must implore His Majesty's pardon, and lay themselves at his feet. Two
Fellows of whom the King had no complaint to make, Charnock and Smith,
were excused from the obligation of making these degrading apologies.
Even James never committed a grosser error. The Fellows, already angry
with themselves for having conceded so much, and galled by the censure
of the world, eagerly caught at the opportunity which was now offered
them of regaining the public esteem. With one voice they declared that
they would never ask pardon for being in the right, or admit that the
visitation of their college and the deprivation of their President had
been legal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account