The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
Probably the most valuable piece of information conveyed to us by
Nennius, relating, it is true, rather to the history of Wales than
to that of England, is derived from these same _Genealogiæ Regum_.
It is to the effect that Maelgwn, King of Gwynedd (North Wales), was
descended in the fifth degree from a certain Cunedag, who with eight
sons marched southward from Manau Guotodin (which is identified with
the district of Lothian), and drove “the Scots” from the region of
Gwynedd, to which they never returned. This southward march took place,
he says, 146 years before Maelgwn reigned. Now, Maelgwn, who was one
of the five kings so fiercely denounced by Gildas, is a historical
personage who certainly reigned in North Wales and whose death is dated
in 547. He is also a link in the chain of Welsh kings who continued
to reign so long as Wales had any independent rulers. The statement,
therefore, amounts to this, that a little before 400, say in 380, or
about the date of the usurpation of Maximus, a chieftain named Cunedag
with his eight sons, and, doubtless, a large army, marched right across
Britain from the Firth of Forth to the Menai Straits, drove out the
“Scots,” that is the Irish invaders who were in possession of the
country, and established a dynasty which endured for nine centuries
(380–1283), till Llewelyn and David, the last royal descendants of
Cunedag, were slain by the order of Edward Plantagenet. This is a
fact unrelated to any other that has been handed down to us, but
which suggests the reflection how many great movements of population,
all memory of which has perished, may have been going forward in our
island during these mist-covered fifth and sixth centuries of our
era. Moreover, the fact that we have here apparently an instance of
a Pictish king conducting a campaign of extermination against the
“Scots,” though these Scots were in Wales, throws some doubt on the
conventional theory that all the calamities of undefended Britain were
due to a war in which the Picts and the Scots were acting in concert.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account