The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
time as the old Passover on “the fourteenth day of the first month,”
on whatever day of the week that day might happen to fall. Not so,
however, with the sons of Iona. Columba, Aidan and all the saints of
the old Celtic Church remembered the Crucifixion on a Friday and the
Resurrection on a Sunday, whether those days fell on the fourteenth
or sixteenth of the lunar month or not. Thus the correct date for the
Christian seasons for both parties had to be arrived at by a compromise
between the week reckoning and the month reckoning; the only question
at issue being the form of that compromise and the limits of permitted
deviation. The Celt contended that the pendulum must swing between
the fourteenth and the twentieth days of the moon’s age; while the
Roman ecclesiastic allowed it to swing only between the fifteenth and
the twenty-first. A small difference truly to cause such long and
heated arguments, yet, as we have seen, where a house was divided
against itself on this question, it might occasion no little practical
inconvenience.
There was much that was illogical and unscientific in the arguments
on both sides of the controversy. The fathers from Iona were fond
of appealing to the authority of the beloved Apostle John, which,
so far as it proved anything, proved not their contention but that
of the old, universally condemned Quarto-decimans. The supporters
of the Roman usage loudly asserted the necessity of following St.
Peter, who certainly cannot be proved, nor can with much probability
be even conjectured, to have ever expressed an opinion on the point
at issue between the Churches. Much stress did they also lay on the
unchanging custom of the Roman Church, whereas that Church had in
fact shown its good sense by modifying its calendar in some important
particulars in deference to the calculations of the more scientific
fathers of Alexandria. Doubtless the real arguments, appealing to the
heart rather than to the head, were on the one side the remembrance of
saintly Christian lives, such as those of Columba and Aidan, producing
a natural reluctance to admit that such men had lived and died in
grievous error; and on the other side a feeling of impatience that
the inhabitants of a few rocky islands in the wild Atlantic should
set their judgment against the richly endowed and stately Churches of
Paris, Arles and Vienne, of Milan and of Rome.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account