The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
If the provisions of Wedmore had made the Watling Street the boundary
between the two nationalities, which is doubtful, the treaty now
concluded was certainly more favourable to the English. It went from
the Thames northwards “up the Lea to its source, then straight on to
Bedford, and then up along the Ouse to the Watling Street,” which
throughout a large part of its further course became practically the
boundary of the two nations. This line gave to the English king London,
previously abandoned to the Danes, and with London the region round it
north of the Thames and west of the Lea, which had previously formed
part of the kingdom of Essex, but which now, perhaps, received a
special organisation of its own, and the name that it has since borne
for ten centuries, Middlesex. It also gave to Alfred the larger and
fairer half of Mercia, being in fact all that portion of the midland
counties which lies south and west of the London and North Western
Railway,[137] together with half of Hertfordshire and two-thirds of
Bedfordshire. But then, on the other hand, it is true that the rest of
Mercia, East Anglia, Essex (mutilated) and Northumbria were practically
handed over to the Danes, either as personal rulers or as over-lords.
This surrender has often been treated as a wise and politic act of
self-sacrifice on Alfred’s part, a view which was the natural result
of the historical teaching which spoke of Egbert and his descendants as
unquestioned monarchs of all Anglo-Saxon Britain. Now, however, that we
see what a precarious and shadowy thing was the supremacy of the ninth
century Kings of Wessex over northern and midland England, a supremacy
which under a feeble king like Ethelwulf perhaps almost vanished into
nothingness, we can see that the settlement which generally (though
incorrectly) goes by the name of the Peace of Wedmore was not so great
a sacrifice on Alfred’s part as we used to imagine. Bitter doubtless it
was to Alfred as to every patriotic heart among the “Angel-cyn” to see
the Dane so firmly rooted in the north and east of England, but that
was the actual position of affairs, and he, as a statesman, was bound
to recognise it. On the other hand, the larger half of Mercia now came
under Alfred’s personal rule and was irrevocably joined to his realm,
and this great new kingdom was now preparing to enter the lists against
the Scandinavian invaders with a fairer prospect of success than could
ever have been entertained by the disunited, mutually suspicious states
of the “Heptarchy”. As has been already pointed out, the Dane was the
real though involuntary creator of a united England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account