The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present timeChallamel, Augustin
History
The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present time
Challamel, Augustin
Clothing and dress -- France -- History
Glove-makers made use of sheepskin, grey fur, hareskin, and doeskin in
their factories. They also made woollen or silken gloves; long buttoned
gloves and scented gloves, and “gloves made of kid prepared with violet
powder.” Italy, Spain, and several French towns were famous for their
skill and trade in gloves. But it was not enough to possess those
articles; it was also necessary to wear them according to the latest
fashion, and on suitable occasions.
There were numerous makers of felt hats, flower head-dress makers of
both sexes, makers of cotton, and of peacock-feathers, without counting
the women weavers of silken head-coverings (a sort of milliner), women
who made hats of orfrey, and silk-spinners. The principal towns of the
kingdom abounded in hosiers, manufacturers of cloth, linen, or silk
hose; in tanners; in clever shoemakers, who well knew how to turn the
point of a shoe _à la poulaine_—that is, extravagantly curved upwards
and resembling the prow of a ship. Generally speaking the shoe _à la
poulaine_ distorted the foot very unpleasantly.
In the goldsmiths’ shops women’s eyes were dazzled by clasps, bracelets,
necklaces, and other articles of marvellous workmanship; tailors
exhibited goods that were in fact only too splendid. Some few mirror
manufacturers kept open shops; their wares were exquisitely lovely.
We may mention one mirror representing a betrothal, that may still be
admired in a celebrated collection.
On every side there was constant temptation. Fortunes were swallowed
up by the passion for dress, and poorer people made the most senseless
sacrifices in the same cause. It was becoming impossible to determine the
rank of a Frenchwoman by her garments.
In order to restore respect for the inequality of ranks, which inequality
was a fixed principle actually corroborated by dress itself, and to
prevent one woman from wearing garments exclusively reserved for another,
sovereigns began to issue sumptuary laws.
Philip Augustus raised his voice against fur; though his court set no
example of simplicity. “The gown and furred cloak of the Queen, at St.
Rémy, cost twenty-eight pounds, less three sous.”
It is interesting to learn what St. Louis, ninth of the name, thought
about fashion and its rights. He said to his courtiers: “You should dress
yourselves well and neatly, in order that your wives may love you the
more, and your people also will esteem you the higher for it.” Women of
rank consequently dressed with great splendour. They frequently wore a
long train fastened to their outer garment, and gilt belts enriched with
jewels. They often wore two tunics, and a veil that was brought round
under the chin. The fastenings of their mantles were of gold and jewels.
They had rosaries of bone, ivory, coral, amber, or jet.
Luxury knew no bounds. The copes, or mantles without hoods, made of
silken cloth, and trimmed with ermine, embroidery, and edgings of gold
were magnificent, and overloaded with ornament.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account