The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present time — John Shaqi
The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present timeChallamel, Augustin
History
The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present time
Challamel, Augustin
Clothing and dress -- France -- History
Brantôme, the historian, relates an amusing anecdote concerning the
starched ruffs. He tells us that on one occasion M. de Fresnes-Forget, in
conversing with Queen Catherine, expressed his surprise that women should
wear such deep ruffs, and affected to doubt that they could eat their
soup when thus attired.
Catherine laughed. The next moment a valet handed her a _bouillie_ for
collation. The queen asked for a long-handled spoon, ate her _bouillie_
easily and without soiling her ruff, and then said, “You see, Monsieur de
Fresnes, that with a little intelligence one can manage anything.”
French ladies copied the Italian fashions in their dress, but with
more grandeur and magnificence. The influence of the Renaissance still
prevailed, and art regulated the style of dress to a considerable extent.
There was little change in the actual shape of the garments worn, more
especially among the middle classes.
It became necessary to restrict foreign importation, in order not to
crush our home manufactures, and Henri II. also thought it right to issue
edicts with reference to propriety of attire, and to the diversity of
ranks as indicated by dress. Laws were even passed concerning the quality
and colour of stuffs.
Thus, no woman, not being a princess, might wear a costume entirely of
crimson; the wives of gentlemen might have one part only of their under
dress of that colour. Maids of honour to the queen, or to the princesses
of the blood, might wear velvet gowns of any colour except crimson; the
attendants on other princesses were restricted to velvet, either black
or _tanné_, viz. an ordinary red, not crimson.
The wealthy bourgeoises, without exception, longed to wear the forbidden
material, and thus to vie with the great ladies; but their ambitious
desires were necessarily thwarted, and the law only allowed them velvet
when made into petticoats and sleeves.
Working-women were forbidden to wear silk. This was an extremely
expensive material, and women would make any sacrifice to procure it.
But as we have already remarked, nothing is so difficult of application
as a sumptuary law. The wives of gentlemen, of bourgeois, and of artisans
were loud in complaint.
Then was the lawgiver moved with compassion, and gave permission for
bands of goldsmith’s work to be worn on the head, for gold braid as
borderings to dresses of ceremony, for necklaces and belts of the same
precious metal.
He allowed working-women to trim their gowns with borders or linings of
silk; and silk was also allowed for false sleeves, the whole dress only
of such costly material was forbidden.
But just in proportion as the relaxation of the first rigorous enactments
was reasonable and right, so did the authorities show themselves stern
and severe towards those women who ventured to transgress the king’s
commands.
Ronsard, the poet, exclaims admiringly, like the clever courtier he was:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account