The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present timeChallamel, Augustin
History
The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present time
Challamel, Augustin
Clothing and dress -- France -- History
On the one hand, the king signed edicts against extravagance, while on
the other he encouraged it by his splendid fêtes. The bourgeois alone
approved of edicts forbidding gold or silver-laced liveries, and fixing
a limit to the price of the handsomest materials. The edict of 1700
was followed by the publication of a print, underneath which was the
following distich:—
“A femme désolée mari joyeux ...
Trêve à la bourse du mari jusqu’à nouvelle mode.”[29]
A decree of the council, dated August 21, 1665, set forth that no woman,
single or married, should be admitted “marchande lingère,” unless she
professed the Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman faith.
Fifteen years later, a poet wrote the following lines:—
“On ne distingue plus nos dames
D’avecque le commun des femmes:
Dès qu’une personne d’honneur
Prend quelque juppe de couleur,
Ou dès qu’elle change de mode,
Enfin, dès qu’elle s’accommode
Dedans un estat éclatant,
Une bourgeoise en fait autant;
Elle s’ornera de panaches,
Et s’appliquera des moustaches,
Des postiches, des faux cheveux,
Des tours, des tresses et des nœuds,
Des coëffes demi-blanche ou jaune,
Où les toiles entrent par aune;
De ces beaux taffetas rayez,
Qui parfois ne sont pas payez,
Car souvent tant de braverie (coquetterie)
Cache beaucoup de gueuserie.”[30]
The above satirical and descriptive tirade may, perhaps, have annoyed the
belles of the day, but it did not reform them.
Law and criticism were alike in vain, and the history of dress, both
masculine and feminine, from the minority of Louis XIV. to the year 1715,
presents a variety of phases that reflect the successive changes at his
court.
When Marie Thérèse arrived in Paris in August, 1660, she was attired in
“a gown enriched with gold, pearls, and precious stones, and was adorned
with the most splendid of the crown jewels.”
A year afterwards, at a fête at Vaux, Mdlle. de la Vallière wore a white
gown, “with gold stars and leaves in Persian stitch, and a pale blue sash
tied in a large knot below the bosom. In her fair waving hair, falling
in profusion about her neck and shoulders, she wore flowers and pearls
mingled together. Two large emeralds shone in her ears.” Her arms were
bare, and encircled above the elbow by a gold open-work bracelet set with
opals. She wore gloves of cream-coloured Brussels lace.
“Langlée, director of the royal sports,” says Mme. de Sévigné, “gave to
Mme. de Montespan a gown of gold upon gold, embroidered in gold, bordered
with gold, above which was a band (frise) of gold, worked in gold mixed
with a particular kind of gold; and forming the most divine material that
can be conceived....”
All women, including the queen-mother, had made use of masks until the
year 1663.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account