The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
Even _roads_, of considerable length and width, appear to have been made
by the same people in this new recovered and marshy country, constructed
of gravel of no small depth and breadth, and formed in a most masterly
manner: of which that leading from _Denver_ to _Peterborough_, or rather,
perhaps, to _Castor_, or _Caister_ in Northamptonshire, is a most
remarkable, and very striking instance. This road, according to
_Dugdale_ (as has been already observed in the _Introduction_) was
composed of gravel, three feet deep, and sixty wide: at present, it is
said to be covered with a moorish soil, from three to five feet thick.
The constructing of such a road, and carrying it for so many miles,
through a country almost totally destitute of gravel, stone, or any other
materials proper for road-making, which must therefore have been procured
from a vast distance, and with immense labour and difficulty, must have
been a very extraordinary and stupendous achievement. In comparison with
which, how puny are the efforts and performances of our modern
adventurers, or commissioners of roads, in this flat country! A proof of
this we have in the great Turnpike Road that leads from _St. German’s_ to
_Wisbeach_, where attempts have been making now for some years to cover
it with gravel, but hitherto with no very great effect. At any rate, it
must appear, that those ancient Colonists, introduced by the Romans, for
the purpose of recovering and improving this great fen-country, were
eminently qualified for the work in which they were employed, and ought
to be still held in grateful remembrance by the good people of England,
especially those of Marshland and the Fens, and esteemed among their very
best benefactors.—The merit of those works and improvements, however,
should not be _all_ ascribed to them: the _Romans_, who introduced,
employed, and maintained them, and who projected the undertaking, should
be allowed some share of it. Nor are the _natives_, or Britons, who
laboriously, powerfully, and effectually assisted in carrying on those
works and improvements, to be entirely overlooked or forgotten on this
occasion. The latter are said to have borne so large a share in those
laborious undertakings, as to occasion very serious complaints and
remonstrances from some of their countrymen to, and against the Romans,
as having cruelly exhausted their strength, by the excessive hardships
and fatigues they had been obliged to undergo in that service. Nor is
this at all incredible; for the Romans are known to have been often very
unfeeling, severe, and cruel task-masters to the nations they had
subdued. If the country was improved it was always at the expense of the
sweat and treasure, and not unfrequently of the groans and lives of its
inhabitants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account