The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
one hundred foot river was determined upon, and Sluices were erected
at Hermitage to drive all the water of old Ouse from Erith (through
the One hundred foot) into the Lynn Ouse; but that river not having
sufficient capacity to utter them to sea, they reverted up the Ouse,
the Stoke and Brandon rivers, drowning the whole of that country, and
finally urging the necessity of erecting Denver Sluices, as the only
apparent cure for the evils with which the country was then
oppressed, and seemed further threatened with. In the execution of
this business, with a view of bringing the bottom of the Ouse on a
level with that of the hundred foot river (which was cut only five
feet deep) it was judged expedient to raise a Dam eight feet high
across the bed of the Ouse, upon the top of which the Sole or base of
Denver Sluices was laid. This measure has not only defeated the
purpose it was designed to promote, but has been the unfortunate
cause of a body of sand and sea sediment being deposited in the bed
of the Lynn Ouse at least eight feet deep at Denver Sluices, and only
terminating in its injurious consequences at the mouth of the Lynn
Channel. This shews to every calm and candid mind the necessity of
duly considering the probable effects of counteracting the laws of
nature, in cases where nature appears experimentally to have had
success on her side.—From a due consideration of the obstacles which
appear at this time to exist in what has long been considered the
principal outfalling drain to the Middle and South levels of the
fens, it is surely reasonable to direct our attention to the general
inclination of the country with respect to the sea, and to what has
all along been pointed out by nature as the main outlet thither, for
the waters of the middle and south levels, and see if some means
cannot yet be devised for recovering the general course of the
ancient and voluntary passage of the waters through their natural
channel of Wisbeach to the sea.”
The above passage merits serious and particular attention. The
undisputed and indisputable fact, that the course of the Ouse lay
formerly by Wisbeach, seems a clear and decisive proof that it was its
natural course, and so may be considered as corroborating a great part at
least of the above reasoning. Upon the whole, therefore, it seems highly
probable that the evils now existing and complained of, as to the bad
state of the Wisbeach and Lynn harbours, the inland navigation and fen
drainage, have mostly originated in the abovementioned desertion of the
Ouse from its ancient and natural outfall, and the forcing of it to Lynn
through the channel of the lesser Ouse, in the 13th century, and reign of
Henry III. as was before observed.
SECTION III.
_Effects of the desertion of the Ouse and Nene on Wisbeach and parts
adjacent_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account