The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
Of the government of Lynn, or its municipal economy in those times, very
little is known, except that it appears to have been under the management
of an officer who bore the name of _provost_, who doubtless was nominated
by the bishop, and acted as his bailiff or deputy; but whether he was
elected annually or held his office for a longer or shorter term, or
during the pleasure of his master, seems rather uncertain. He was,
however, the chief magistrate of the town, and had, of course, other
officers assisting and acting under him, like our chief magistrates of
more modern times. It is very provable that the order of things in this
town was not so materially changed by _king_ JOHN as some may imagine.
The chief alteration apparently was, that the town now ranked among those
incorporated by royal charter, was consequently declared a free burgh,
had its burgesses exempted from tolls, &c. in all parts of England, but
London; and finally, had its chief magistrate denominated _mayor_,
instead of _provost_, {393b} a circumstance, probably of no mighty
consequence, or real benefit to the community, though highly gratifying,
perhaps, to the pride and vanity of the corporation. The real
difference, however, between a _mayor_ and a _provost_, seems to be very
little, if any thing, more than that between _Tweedledum_ and
_Tweedledee_. The former indeed is generally taken to be the highest and
most honourable appellation, and therefore our corporations naturally
prefer it to the other, as the title of their head man, or chief
magistrate. After all, the inferiority of the _provost_ does not seem
always perceivable; and nobody, perhaps, would deem the _lord_ MAYOR _of
York_ as superior in dignity to the _lord PROVOST of Edinburgh_.
The smiles and favours of royalty are always gratifying to most people:
those of _king JOHN_ were so, no doubt, to his Lynn subjects, and may be
supposed to have confirmed them more than ever in their attachment to
him, which appears to have continued strong and steady afterwards during
the remainder of his reign. Of the worth and merit of that attachment,
his majesty seemed duly sensible: as a proof of which, they received from
him in return, some very flattering and lasting tokens, beside the
immunities and privileges specified in his charters; especially the
silver _cup_ which is still in being, and shewn to strangers and others
as a great curiosity. It is an elegant double-gilt, embossed, and
enamelled cup and cover, weighing 73 ounces, and of exquisite
workmanship, and shews the uncommon skill and ingenuity of some our
silver-smiths of that period, who were probably of the monkish order, as
our best artists, as well as most renowned scholars, were then chiefly to
be found within the solemn precincts of our monasteries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account